Faraz님의 프로필Faraz's Blog사진블로그리스트기타 도구 도움말

블로그


    10월 24일

    Intelligent people

    Most interesting statistics found in last week's Lexington column in the ECONOMIST.

    Yet a poll last month found that most Americans would rather their government did less. Some 57% said it was doing too many things that were better left to individuals and businesses. Only 38% thought it should do more. The proportion who believe that government over-regulates private businesses has also risen from 38% to 45% in a year. And despite the attention lavished on Michael Moore’s new movie excoriating capitalism, only 24% of Americans think firms are under-regulated.

    Totally crazy, people think that bank and corporations should have less regulation. Wow.

    10월 7일

    Glenn Beck

    He tells viewers that Obama's volunteerism efforts are really an attempt to create  a "civilian national-security force that is just as strong , just as powerful as the military."

    10월 4일

    Sheldon Adelson

    Wow, was reading an old Time on the loo today. Came across this article about Las Vegas and how it has come to be hit really hard by the recession. Condos that were selling for 600,000 dollars last year are now selling for less than 200,000. How crazy is that.
    Anyway the reason it was a worthwhile article, so much so that I logged into here to write  a bit about it is this casino owner Adelson. This guy was worth 40 billion last year apparently and now is worth 4 billion. But I guess what difference it makes, once you're past the 100s of million mark would it really make much difference to your lifestyle? The article says it does, read underline part at the bottom.
    Funny, I kinda would want to know more about it. Seems like quite a character.
    That is true even of Sheldon Adelson, who has lost more during this recession than anyone else on the planet. The 76-year-old chairman of the Las Vegas Sands Corp., which owns the Venetian hotel, the Sands Expo and Convention Center and the Venetian Macao, was in 2007 and '08 the third richest person in the world, with — by his estimate — a net worth of $40 billion. By February of this year, he said he had lost $36.5 billion — more than the GDP of half of the countries in the world. In the years before that slide, banks were begging him to take their money, given his massive success in building the first Vegas-style hotel and casino in Macao, China, in 2004. Adelson didn't hesitate, taking all he could get and building an entire mini-Vegas in Macao called the Cotai Strip, along with huge casinos in Singapore; he also doubled his Vegas space by adding the Palazzo to his Venetian hotel. In a short time, he has accumulated a debt-to-earnings ratio of 6.8 to 1 in the U.S. Then the loans stopped coming, and his stock price sank from $144 to $1.42 in March. (It now hovers at about $12.)

    He doesn't seem too crushed by his losses. "A billion dollars doesn't buy what it used to. So it's not as tragic as one would assume," he says. "I say to my wife that the worst tragedy I could have in business deserves a two-hour cry, and I scale down from there. I didn't cry one moment." When his wife asked him to cut back on expenses, he dismissed the suggestion, telling her he still had more money than they could ever spend. Eventually he capitulated: whenever possible, he uses his small private jet instead of his big one.
    9월 23일

    Khwaja and Ijaz-ul-Haq get personal - Exposing Each Other!

     PLEASE CLICK PLAY BUTTON >

    Quote

    YouTube - Khwaja and Ijaz-ul-Haq get personal - Exposing Each Other!
      

    8월 6일

    Gojra

    An excellent article about the recent burning and killing of Christians in Gojra.
    Thank god some people in Pakistan are not scared to oppose Sipah-e-Sahaba.

    Burned at the stake
    Thursday, August 06, 2009
    By Talat Farooq
    Let us hope that in the wake of the Gojra incident the suo motu action taken by the chief justice of the Lahore High Court will result in justice for the aggrieved Christian community. Until now blasphemy cases have been settled mostly by vigilantes and not by the judicial system. Although under the blasphemy law none of the accused has been executed to date, the lynch mob has often taken the law into its own hands, and with impunity.

    In 1997, the twin villages of Shantinagar-Tibba Colony were looted and burned by hundreds of zealots and policemen acting together after an alleged desecration of the Holy Quran. The police, after evacuating the Christians, helped the zealots loot and blow up the victims' property, using battlefield explosives. The Sipah-e-Sahaba was linked to the tragedy.

    In 2005, a local elected politician led a mob of 3,000 and, helped by the police, wreaked havoc on Christian homes and churches in Sangla Hill after a rumour of desecration was started by religious elements. It was alleged by the archbishop of Lahore that the mobsters were brought into the town on buses. The Punjab government was prevented from acting fairly by a Lahore-based Sunni cleric and his lashkar.

    And this past June 30, all hell broke loose in Bahmaniwala in Kasur after a Muslim and Christian youth driving tractor trolleys started to quarrel on the right of passage. The scuffle soon turned into anti-Christian violence after the local cleric announced from the mosque that Christians had desecrated the Quran and therefore a "jihad" was in order. The violent mob burned and looted Christian property and churches. More than 700 people took refuge in fields at night to escape the wrath of the mob.

    The latest incidents in Gojra tell a similar tale. The Punjab law minister himself said on record that after initial investigations it was revealed that no act of desecration had taken place and that the violence was fuelled by rumours of the alleged act – and that the mob was being led by a cleric. While neighbours settled scores, the mob took the law into its own hands on the instigation of extremists of the Sipah-e-Sahaba from Jhang. And all this while the law enforcers watched and did nothing. Reports that the Punjab government had been forewarned of such violence have been denied by Punjab police officials. Nonetheless, the wilful inaction by the police during the incident is there for all to see and cannot be denied.

    Be it the burning of women accused of being witches in medieval Europe or acts of the zealots in today's Pakistan, it is quite evident that religious fanaticism feeds on mob mentality. It is easier for people fearing for their own lives and safety to succumb to the herd instinct and join stone-throwing crowds. Moreover, many find it emotionally cathartic to vent on a weaker group their pent-up anger at their own sorry state of existence.

    With regard to the victimisation of religious minorities, the zealots often not only incite the mob but also pressure or threaten judges and lawyers after an accused has been arrested. Because of the presence of extremist elements within their cadres as well as lack of moral courage, members of the law enforcement agencies easily succumb to pressure or intimidation. They provide impunity to private acts of vengeance by either actively participating in violence or through delaying tactics. By deliberately failing to apprehend the culprits, such officials become accomplices of the criminals. Add to this the pliant state that gives in to the blackmail of religious extremists, and the recipe for disaster is complete.

    In the aftermath of Gojra, both the Punjab and federal governments have been quick to take stock of the situation. One hopes that all the political hustle and bustle will not translate into monetary compensations alone, and that the culprits will be punished in accordance with the law. Extremists and bigots are enemies of society and must be dealt with with an iron hand. There is no point in appealing to their better sense because they do not have any. They are like serial killers who must be quarantined for the security and the general good of society.

    Any law that gives rise to discrimination or abuse or is so open-ended as to jeopardise human rights is itself contrary to the spirit of Islam and should be either repealed or drastically amended forthwith.

    The concept of desecration of the Holy Quran should be widened to include wilful manipulations of Quranic injunctions and of using the Holy Book out of context to incite others to violence. It is a sad commentary on our collective double standards that while we are ready to follow rituals and do things which only change one's physical appearance, we do not follow the Holy Prophet's (PBUH) many acts where he emphasised the importance of tolerance, where he fought for the oppressed or where he countered irrationality and ignorance with the power of reason and intellect.



    The writer is executive editor of the magazine Criterion, Islamabad. Email: talat

    farooq11@gmail.com

    6월 30일

    Go Tutu


    December 27, 1989

    Tutu Urges Israelis to Pray for and Forgive Nazis

    By ALAN COWELL, Special to The New York Times

    Archbishop Desmond M. Tutu of Cape Town, the Anglican Primate of Southern Africa, urged Israelis today to pray for and forgive those responsible for the Nazi genocide.

    ''Our Lord would say that in the end the positive thing that can come is the spirit of forgiving, not forgetting, but the spirit of saying: God, this happened to us,'' the South African cleric said after visiting Jerusalem's Yad Vashem Holocaust memorial.

    ''We pray for those who made it happen, help us to forgive them and help us so that we in our turn will not make others suffer,'' he said in what he described as the message he would offer to the descendants of those who suffered the Nazi crime that took six million Jewish lives.

    The comments were the latest in a series of statements that Israelis have found irksome on a four-day Christmas pilgrimage to the Holy Land by the South African cleric. He has condemned what he called Israeli oppression and compared Israel's handling of the Palestinians to South Africa's treatment of blacks.

    Shortly before the Archbishop met today with the Israeli Religious Affairs Minister, Zevulun Hammer, protesters scrawled the words ''Tutu is a Nazi'' on the ministry wall.

    Earlier, others had written: ''Black Nazi pig'' on the walls of St. George's Cathedral in Arab East Jerusalem, where the Archbishop was staying.

    Other Israelis have said he has displayed bias by failing to meet with other Israeli leaders. But he remained undeterred by the criticism. ''If I met your Prime Minister, I would make exactly the same point,'' he told reporters. ''I would say to him that I cannot myself understand people who have suffered as the Jews have suffered inflicting the suffering of the kind I have seen on the Palestinians.''

    ''The land that gave birth to the Prince of Peace is wracked by violence, hatred and hostility,'' he said.

    Mr. Hammer, the Religious Affairs Minister, said there was ''some kind of misunderstanding in his statements about Israel.'' One Government official, however, seemed heartened by the furor. ''We thought he might have made trouble for us,'' the official said. ''But he has damaged himself.'' But church officials said the Archbishop's comments were consistent with Christian doctrine of forgiveness of adversaries. One official, who asked not to be identified, said the comments would nevertheless anger Israelis living with the memory of the Nazi crime.

    In an interview earlier, Archbishop Tutu urged that economic sanctions against his country be applied ''rigorously and intensively'' and said President F. W. de Klerk had not yet offered sufficient concessions to the black majority to merit easing of the measures.

    Since anti-Government protest erupted in the mid-1980's in South Africa, the United States, Western European nations and the Commonwealth, the association of former British colonies, have all ordered an array of economic restrictions supposed to limit South African access to credit and overseas markets.

    Israel has a close strategic relationship with South Africa's white leaders and is thus branded by some South African blacks as an implicit supporter of apartheid rule.

    The South African cleric has been at the forefront of the long-running campaign by his country's black majority to end rule by the white minority. ''Mr de Klerk is a more personable individual,'' he replied when asked to compare the two white leaders. ''He is someone who appears to me to listen. He does smile more. He doesn't wave his finger.'' Moreover, he said, the South African President, who assumed power earlier this year, ''has done certain things that has given some space.''

    ''These are things that we want to acknowledge,'' he said, listing the release of some prominent political prisoners, the desgregation of beaches and a decision not to block some anti-apartheid demonstrations.

    Archbishop Tutu continued: ''He does not seem in my view to have a coherent, precise program of how he intends to dismantle apartheid. We are still sitting with a state of emergency. We are still sitting with severe restrictions on the media.''

    http://www.nytimes.com/1989/12/27/world/tutu-urges-israelis-to-pray-for-and-forgive-nazis.html?pagewanted=print
    6월 25일

    Obama knows his stuff

     Pakistan will win war against extremists: Obama

    Sunday, June 21, 2009
    Rules out mediation on Kashmir; says no one can push Islamabad on Waziristan operation

    News Desk

    RAWALPINDI: US President Barrack Hussain Obama has ruled out sending American troops to Pakistan to hunt down top al-Qaeda leadership and expressed confidence that the Pakistani government and military would win war against extremists.

    In an interview, the American president also expressed confidence in the Pakistani government ability to safeguard the nuclear weapons. “I have confidence that the Pakistani government has safeguarded its nuclear arsenal. It’s Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal.”

    When asked was Pakistan strong enough to win war against extremists, Obama said: “Well, I think that — I have confidence in the Pakistani people and the Pakistani state in resolving differences through a democratic process and to isolate extremists. Dating back to Jinnah, Pakistan has always had a history of overcoming difficulties. There’s no reason why it can’t overcome those difficulties today.”

    To a question about pushing Pakistan into the military operation in Waziristan, Obama said nobody could or should push the Pakistani government. The Pakistani government was accountable to the people of Pakistan.

    “I think the Pakistani government and the people of Pakistan recognize that when you have extremists who are assassinating moderate clerics like Dr Naeemi, when you have explosions that are killing innocent women and children, that that can’t be the path for development and prosperity for Pakistan. And so there’s been a decision that’s made that we support, that the Pakistani military and the Pakistani government will not stand by idly as extremists attempt to disrupt the country.”

    But, he added, ultimately these were decisions to be made by the Pakistani government and the Pakistani people.

    The US president said: “We would much prefer being a partner with countries like Afghanistan or Pakistan, and simply work together on issues of common interest like commerce and increasing trade and improving development in all countries. But it’s very difficult to do that if you have people who have distorted a great religion and are now trying to wreak havoc not only in the West but most often directed against fellow Muslims in places like Pakistan. And that is something that we will always stand against.”

    When asked about anti-American sentiments in Pakistan due to drone attacks and any plan to send troops to Pakistan for hunting down Osama, Obama refused to comment on specific operations. However, he ruled out sending American troops to Pakistan. “Pakistan and its military are dealing with their security issues. The support that we’ve provided right now is focused primarily on the internally displaced persons.”

    He said, “Our primary goal is to be a partner and a friend to Pakistan and to allow Pakistan to thrive on its own terms, respecting its own traditions, respecting its own culture. We simply want to make sure that our common enemies, which are extremists who would kill innocent civilians, that that kind of activity is stopped, and we believe that it has to be stopped whether it’s in the United States or in Pakistan or anywhere in the world.”

    About any plan to visit Pakistan, he said, “I would love to visit. I had Pakistani roommates in college who were very close friends of mine. I went to visit them when I was still in college; was in Karachi and went to Hyderabad. Their mothers taught me to cook.” He said he could cook keema and dal.

    He said he had a great affinity for Pakistani culture and the great Urdu poets. He said: “So my hope is, is that I’m going to have an opportunity at some point to visit Pakistan.”

    To a query about Pak-India dialogue and Kashmir issue, the US president ruled out mediation between Pakistan and India, and said: “We can’t dictate to Pakistan or India how they should resolve their differences, but we know that both countries would prosper if those differences are resolved.”

    “I don’t think that we’ve been silent on the fact that India is a great friend of the United States and Pakistan is a great friend of the United States, and it always grieves us to see friends fighting.”

    “I believe that there are opportunities, maybe not starting with Kashmir but starting with other issues, that Pakistan and India can be in a dialogue together and over time to try to reduce tensions and find areas of common interest. And we want to be helpful in that process, but I don’t think it’s appropriate for us to be the mediators in that process.”

    He said dialogue was the best way to reduce tensions. He maintained that the recent meeting between Prime Minister Singh and President Zardari wasn’t an extensive conversation but it was the start of what might end up being more productive conversations in the future.

    He also appreciated the services of the Pakistani American community in the US and said, “One of the great opportunities I think for Pakistan is to be able to draw on all this talent and extraordinary entrepreneurship to help provide concrete benefits to the Pakistani people, and I think that’s one of the biggest challenges for Pakistan.”

    “We want to be a partner in opening up trade opportunities, but making sure that people on the ground, day to day, they’re getting an education, children are going to school, that farmers are able to get a decent compensation for their products, that electricity and infrastructure is built, because I know the Pakistani people and I know that if the tools are there available to them, then they will thrive and continue to be a great nation.”

    When about his opinion on conditions to US aid for Pakistan, Obama said, “We have to help Pakistan and provide them the resources that will allow for development. Now, we have in the past supported Pakistan militarily. I think it is important to make sure that military support is directed at extremists and our common enemies.”

    “But I also think that the relationship between the United States and Pakistan can’t just be based on military-to-military cooperation. It’s got to be based on something richer that involves development and exchanges of students and business people, and development. And so we want to encourage that kind of work, as well.”

    He also mentioned US efforts effort that raised $5 billion of development assistance for Pakistan at a donors conference in Japan, and American aid of hundreds of millions of dollars for internally displaced people.

    “That’s the kind of strategy that I think will bring our countries closer together. And having known the people of Pakistan, I am convinced that the future between our two countries can be very, very bright,” he observed.

    To a question about Iran’s situation, the US president said, “I think that what’s been happening in Iran is remarkable. We respect Iran’s sovereignty, but we also are witnessing peaceful demonstrations, people expressing themselves, and I stand for that universal principle that people should have a voice in their own lives and their own destiny. And I hope that the international community recognizes that we need to stand behind peaceful protests and be opposed to violence or repression.”

    About Middle East problem, Obama said, “I’ve been very aggressive in saying that Israelis and Palestinians have to resolve their differences and create two states that can live side by side in peace and security, and I’ve put forward a special envoy, George Mitchell, a former majority leader of the United States Senate, to work with the parties involved.”
    2월 9일

    AMAZING ARTICLE

    Lost Imaginations*

    Jump to Comments

    jinnah_with-fatima-and-dina2By Raza Rumi

    Sixty one years have gone by but the creation of Pakistan is still a heated debate: contested, fractured and bitter. That history has been the preserve of the victors and the powerful is well known. But to spin and whirl the truth to the extent that it becomes empty and farcical is an art form practiced by the Pakistani state and its mock-historians.
    In early January of this new year, a heated controversy entered the public domain. A famous Urdu columnist writing for the largest vernacular newspaper reiterated the widely-known fact that the pragmatic Mr Jinnah had accepted the Cabinet Mission Plan and given up the demand for Pakistan in 1946. However, it was the intransigence of the Indian National Congress and the quest for absolute power by Pandit Nehru and his associates that led to the traumatic moment of partition.

    To support this position, Dr Ayesha Jalal’s seminal work, ‘The Sole Spokesman’ was cited by the Urdu columnist. Dr Jalal, in her outstanding book, has captured the nuances of partition history and presented an interpretation that is unbiased and brings forth the complexities of the Indian Muslim community. This community was by no means the monolith Jinnah had to contend with.

    No sooner was this column published than a barrage of protests appeared in the press, authored by holier-than-thou writers who thought that this was an insult to the concept of Pakistan and that Jinnah was determined on creating Pakistan come hell or high water. The debate intensified, and as is the case in Pakistan came down to personal invective and attacks on Dr Jalal. Among others, a key conspiracy theory articulated was that her supervisor at Cambridge University was a ‘Hindu’ who must have misled her to undo the foundations of the holy project called Pakistan.

    This was a ludicrous charge and betrayed our penchant to undermine scholarship and history. Dr Jalal’s book, if anything, elucidates Jinnah’s towering personality and qualities of leadership and negotiation in full measure. Her book revisits onerous challenges that Jinnah faced in negotiating for the political rights of the Muslims in a post-British India. Like most historical events, Pakistan was not a project cast in stone or a divine scheme, as our mock-historians sponsored by the state and its moribund institutions would have us believe. I was quite perturbed as I followed this debate. Over the last two decades, one had thought, a more nuanced understanding of Jinnah had gained currency in Pakistan’s popular imagination. Alas, it remains nothing but a case of lost imagination.

    The reason for this poverty of intellect and imagination is rooted in the distortion of history and its flagrant abuse by the ruling classes of Pakistan. Is it not clear by now who benefited the most out of Pakistan’s creation – the bureaucrats of United Pakistan, the mercantile class of Bombay and Gujerat, the feudals of Sindh and the Punjab, or the Pakistan Army? Popular support for Pakistan was widespread amongst East Bengalis who we were quick to dispose of, as they wanted a Pakistan that was plural, democratic, non-feudal and socially just.

    Of course our official historians would not see this. They cast aspersions on anyone trying to unpack the mess caused by partition – its bloodline is as fresh as ever. Look at the state of Indo-Pak relations. The demonising of Hindus is as fervent as the demonising of Muslims by the Hindutva brigades in India. Jinnah was not of this ilk. His wife was a Parsi, many of his close friends were Hindus and his daughter married a Parsi and did not move to her father’s new homeland. Could anything be more tragic than this?

    Jinnah certainly did not envisage the martial state, engineered to destroy India, that we are today. This applies to India as well, where Gandhi and Nehru could never have promoted a nuclear dénouement in the subcontinent. In several interviews, Jinnah talked of going to India for vacations, and even moving there after retirement. The properties in Delhi and Bombay owned by Jinnah were kept intact for this purpose. Contrary to popular distortion, Jinnah even accepted his son-in-law, and there is a small monograph, a young historian tells me, in a US library, that was authored by Dina Jinnah, in which she testifies to her father’s softening up towards his non-Muslim son-in-law, to whom he had apparently presented a cap.

    Pakistan’s grand old historian K K Aziz who is unwell now and lacks any means of support to finish his important projects, told me how Fatima Jinnah’s little book on her brother had been censored by these very masters of state power. What was the fuss all about? Well, Fatima Jinnah had not been too kind about Liaquat Ali Khan and a few other heroes of the Pakistan movement. If anything, many of the heroes were rank opportunists, power-seeking fief-holders, who all jumped onto the Pakistan ship when it became clear to them that this was the land where they would make good, without competition from more qualified Hindus.

    And the good times continue to roll. I want to index all the last [feudal] names of the 1946 Constituent Assembly members and see how their progeny keep on going in the centers of power. This is beyond tragedy and beyond farce.
    Two chance meetings with Dr Jalal this winter were exceedingly rewarding. She talked of her new research with pride, intensity and much concern as to where Pakistan was headed. Dr Jalal is a fiercely nationalistic Pakistani and believes that Pakistan’s very survival speaks of its inherent strengths. But she also laments how the old colonial state has finally given way to multiple states and centers of power within the polity. In the coming months Dr Jalal is going to expound this thesis. But we see it all around us: Jinnah’s Pakistan is now a splintered riyasat – there are little kingdoms in the tribal areas, in the northwestern province, and in southern Punjab that continue to bleed society and defy public policy, making us a joke on the global map.

    True, we inherited the worst of geographical locations and a ‘moth-eaten’ country to quote Jinnah. But by writing false histories and nurturing delusions of grandeur we have become a delusional society. We want Islam, modernity, the Taliban and Bollywood, all at the same time. We loathe America but the queues for American visas are longer than ever. We continue to search for our identity: we are by turns Central Asian, Persian and Arab and turn our backs on our closest approximation which is Indian. The one thing we know is that we are not Indian. We claim the Mughals as our own, but ignore the fact that most of them were secular and born of Hindu mothers. We love invaders and name missiles after them, but refuse to acknowledge that most Pakistanis were converts from lower caste Hindus.

    There appears to be no discipline of history – academic or popular – worth its name in Pakistan. The great empire of missiles, jihadis and opportunists has left no space for independent voices, and scholarship is stymied by state pressure or its proxy goons masquerading as patriots. It is time to revisit history and speak up against decades of lies and constructed histories, if we are to reclaim our future.

    Raza Rumi blogs at www.razarumi.com <http://www.razarumi.com/>  and edits Pak Tea House and Lahore Nama e-zines.

    2월 1일

    Will people listen to this?

    http://letusbuildpakistan.blogspot.com/2009/01/swat-muted-protests-wont-do.html

    Swat: Muted protests won’t do

    Muted protests won’t do

    By Zubeida Mustafa

    PAKISTANIS have perfected the art of protest. Karachi has posters plastered on the walls calling on people to demonstrate their solidarity with the Palestinians in Gaza.

    In 2007 Musharraf’s coup against the judiciary brought lawyers on to the roads until ‘democracy’ returned to this country. But why are the voices of protest so muted when it comes to Swat? To protest against such tragedies is a duty. And Swat is a tragedy that will ultimately shape the future of Pakistan.

    Is there something more to the situation in Swat than meets the eye? True, the events there have been overshadowed by the larger picture of the war against terror in Fata and Afghanistan. But that doesn’t mean Swat has little to mourn about. It is not just the slaughter that has left the people speechless. It is the accompanying brutality and ruthlessness that make one’s blood curdle. Obviously, the idea is to spread terror. Some snippets from the press make chilling reading:

    The figure for civilian casualties runs into hundreds.

    • 200,000 of Swat’s 1.7 million population have fled their homes.

    • The government’s effective writ has receded from the state’s 5,337 sq km to 36 sq km around Mingora.

    • To terrorise the people, militants resort to a public show of barbarity and instances have been reported of men’s throats being slit and their corpses being left hanging from poles with a warning that they should not be removed.

    • Women have been ordered to stay home and those defying the ban have been proclaimed prostitutes and slain.

    • Girls’ schools — the number varies from 170 to 200 — have been torched or bombed and female education prohibited.

    • Men resisting the Taliban have been declared informers and accomplices of the government and shot dead or have had their property destroyed.

    • The militants dominate the airwaves and Maulana Fazlullah’s FM radio continues to pour out its retrogressive messages of violence.

    • Swat today has a visible presence of foreigners from Central Asia. What are they doing there?

    • People speak of terrorists/training camps operating in the area.

    • Tourism the mainstay of Swat’s economy is at a standstill.

    These atrocities are shocking and you wonder why people are silent. And then one voice is raised on the Internet. It is Shaheen Sardar Ali’s, a native of that region who teaches law at the Warwick University. In a poignant piece titled “Will the gula-i-nargis bloom this spring in the Swat valley?” she asks: “How long before we will say: enough is enough and rise, speak and act? How much more suffering before we declare emphatically that we refuse to be harassed and silenced any longer and demand answers for the wrongdoings meted out to us? How many more humans will have to be slaughtered, before we stand up and say NO.”

    There is method in the madness that has engulfed Swat. This is not simply a battle between two civilisations — one seeking to impose by force its own brand of the Sharia on the people and the other resisting this imposition. If it was just a struggle of this kind, the army with its superior firepower and commitment to defend the writ of the state could easily have checked the insurgency and brought peace to this idyllic valley.

    The Taliban by and large do not enjoy the support of the population, we are told, and so this is not a classical case of guerrilla conflict which defies conventional strategies of law enforcement. If Swat continues to be in flames even six months after Operation Rah-i-Haq was launched, there is something sinister going on up there. Has the old game of running with the hare and hunting with the hounds returned to the agenda of the defenders of this land? While the army claims it is waging a war against the Taliban, strangely enough the enemy seems to be thriving as it expands its operations.

    At stake is the credibility of the army which has not been helped by the contradiction between words and deeds that is striking. This is not something we are not familiar with. In his exhaustive study of the Pakistan Army, Crossed Swords, Shuja Nawaz speaks of “local militant groups with shadowy links, past or present, to the ISI”, which was, along with other agencies, “allowed to keep open ties to Islamic groups”. Even in the aftermath of the Mumbai attacks we have the US Assistant Secretary of State for South Asia, Richard Boucher, speaking last week of delinking the Inter Services Intelligence from terrorist groups in Pakistan. We do not know how deep and in which direction these links run.

    The United States itself is not above all suspicion either. It was known to be engaging the Taliban in Afghanistan in 1997 when Washington was interested in procuring an oil and gas pipeline project for Unocal in that country. Now it wants them decimated.

    And what about our political parties that now feign to be so powerless in Swat? They have all contributed in one way or another to facilitating the rise of Islamic militancy. Just read what Dr Fazal-ur-Rahim Marwat of the University of Peshawar recounts in his book Talibanisation of Pakistan. According to him, it was in June 1989 that the elders of Malakand convened a meeting of the representatives of all political parties that included the ANP, PPP and PML-N as well as an assortment of religious groups to set up the Tehrik-i-Nifaaz-i-Shariat-i-Muhammadi (TSNM) which chose Maulana Sufi Mohammad of the JI as its leader. The TNSM began gathering strength in 1994 when the PPP was in office in Islamabad and Naseerullah Babar was busy organising the Taliban in Afghanistan.Not to be left behind, it was the PML-N government in its second stint which extended formal recognition to the Taliban regime in Kabul in 1997, clearly indicating its leanings. Today, the ANP presides over the tragedy in Swat.

    It is difficult to define the changing equations between the numerous stakeholders. Now when the genie is out of the bottle, who will take the blame? The common people of Swat will have to bear the brunt and for many of them the gula-i-nargis will never bloom again, though the crisis is not of their making. (Dawn)

    zubeidam@gmail.com
    1월 30일

    Hit the nail on the head

    ter the Gaza war

    Peace now?
    Jan 22nd 2009
    From The Economist print edition


    At the very least, this is not a bad time to start serious work

    AFP
    AFP


    FRANCE’S president, Nicolas Sarkozy, has a reputation for letting his enthusiasm run away with him. Having rushed with other European heads of government to the Middle East to douse the flames of Gaza, he returned home with a characteristically grandiose idea. Now that a truce seems to be taking hold, he wants, “within weeks”, to convene a peace conference to begin solving the whole conflict once and for all.

    Impetuosity can be a dangerous thing in diplomacy. One reason for the failure of Israel and the Palestinians to make peace at Camp David in 2000 was a lack of adequate preparation by Bill Clinton. And Mr Sarkozy would certainly be a fool to rush in before co-ordinating any proposal with Barack Obama. But the French president’s main insight is correct: the aftermath of the Gaza war is as good a moment as any—and maybe even better than many—to breathe new urgency into broader peacemaking in the Middle East.

    This is because nothing focuses minds faster than a war. Gaza is only the latest bloody reminder that when this particular conflict is left to smoulder, it tends to ignite with a bang, the reverberations of which travel far beyond Palestine itself. The anger on the Arab street has shaken pro-American Arab regimes such as Egypt’s and will hinder Mr Obama’s efforts to open a friendlier chapter in America’s relations with Islam.

    All of this strengthens the case for Mr Obama to do what he has promised and tackle the Arab-Israeli conflict right away. There is, however, an argument against. This holds that the present circumstances are in fact all wrong. When Mr Clinton was president, the Palestinians still had what they used to call a sole, legitimate representative in the person of Yasser Arafat, who said he accepted the permanence of Israel. How can diplomacy work now that the Palestinians are split between Fatah in the West Bank and, in Gaza, the Islamists of Hamas who say they reject the very idea of peace with a Jewish state?

    The answer to this excellent question is not to put diplomacy on hold. Nor is it to pretend, as George Bush did, that Fatah can make peace with Israel as though Hamas did not exist. Instead, American, European and Arab diplomacy should now join forces to mend the Palestinian schism. The peacemakers are not without tools. Hamas held a hollow “victory” parade this week (see article), but Israel’s rampage through Gaza’s streets and skies may have reduced the allure of “armed struggle” in the eyes of both the movement’s leaders and its followers. The right mixture of pressure and inducements, including an end to Gaza’s economic blockade, might well tempt Hamas back into a unity government, not least because it stands a fair chance of controlling such a government when next there are elections in both Gaza and the West Bank.

    Would it be a disaster if Hamas won? Only if it stood by its rejectionist creed. Yet Fatah too once called for the destruction of Israel, and changed its mind. Hamas even now sends out enough hints of pragmatism to make it worth seeing whether it can be induced to undertake a similar ideological journey. But—and here is the other immediate job for the peacemakers—Hamas will not be induced to compromise unless the prospect of a Palestinian state begins to look real. To that end, Mr Obama needs to make it clear, preferably before Israel’s election next month, that America will no longer countenance Israel’s colonisation of the West Bank. The Jewish settlements there should never have been built, and Israel has promised to freeze them. This has become a test. If Mr Obama cannot hold Israel to its promise, his chances of restoring America’s standing as the indispensable mediator in this conflict are nil.

    http://www.economist.com/opinion/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12972669

    1월 22일

    Wow, change

    International Herald Tribune
    Obama to close foreign prisons and Guantánamo
    By Mark Mazzetti and William Glaberson
    Thursday, January 22, 2009

    WASHINGTON: President Barack Obama is expected to take the first steps to undo Bush-era detention policies on Thursday, signing executive orders directing the Central Intelligence Agency to shut what remains of its network of secret prisons and ordering the closing of the Guantánamo detention camp within a year, government officials said.

    The orders would rewrite American rules for the detention of terrorism suspects. They would require an immediate review of the 245 detainees still held at the naval base in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, to determine if they should be transferred, released or prosecuted.

    And the orders would bring to an end a Central Intelligence Agency program that kept terrorism suspects in secret custody for months or years, a practice that has brought fierce criticism from foreign governments and human rights activists. They will also prohibit the CIA from using coercive interrogation methods, requiring the agency to follow the same rules used by the military in interrogating terrorism suspects, government officials said.

    But the orders would leave unresolved complex questions surrounding the closing of the Guantánamo prison, including whether, where and how any of the detainees are to be prosecuted. They could also allow Obama to reinstate the CIAs detention and interrogation operations in the future, by presidential order, as some have argued would be appropriate if Osama bin Laden or another top-level leader of Al Qaeda were captured.

    The new White House counsel, Gregory Craig, briefed lawmakers about some elements of the orders on Wednesday evening. A congressional official who attended the session said Craig acknowledged concerns from intelligence officials that new restrictions on CIA methods might be unwise and indicated that the White House might be open to allowing the use of methods other the 19 techniques allowed for the military.

    Details of the directive involving the CIA were described by government officials who insisted on anonymity so that they could not be blamed for pre-empting a White House announcement. Copies of the draft order on Guantánamo were provided by people who have consulted with Obama's transition team and requested anonymity for the same reason.

    The executive order on interrogations is certain to be received with some skepticism at the CIA, which for years has maintained that the military's interrogation rules are insufficient to get information from senior Qaeda figures like Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. The Bush administration asserted that the harsh interrogation methods were instrumental in gaining valuable intelligence on Qaeda operations.

    The intelligence agency built a network of secret prisons in 2002 to house and interrogate senior Qaeda figures captured overseas. The exact number of suspects to have moved through the prisons is unknown, although Michael Hayden, the departing director of the agency, has in the past put the number at "fewer than 100."

    The secret detentions brought international condemnation, and in September 2006, President George W. Bush ordered that the remaining 14 detainees in CIA custody be transferred to Guantánamo Bay and tried by military tribunals.

    But Bush made clear at the time that he was not shutting down the CIA detention system, and in the last two years, two Qaeda operatives are believed to have been detained in agency prisons for several months each before being transferred to Guantánamo Bay.

    A government official said Obama's order on the CIA would still allow its officers abroad to temporarily detain terrorism suspects and transfer them to other agencies, but would no longer allow the agency to carry out long-term detentions.

    Since the early days after the 2001 attacks, the intelligence agency's role in detaining terrorism suspects has been significantly scaled back, as has the severity of interrogation methods the agency is permitted to use. The most controversial practice, the simulated drowning technique known as water-boarding, was used on three suspects but has not been used since 2004, C.IA. officials said.

    But at the urging of the Bush administration, Congress in 2006 authorized the agency to continue using harsher interrogation methods than those permitted for use by other agencies, including the military. Those exact methods remain classified. The order on Guantánamo says that the camp, which received its first hooded and chained detainees seven years ago this month, "shall be closed as soon as practicable, and no later than one year from the date of this order."

    The order calls for a cabinet-level panel to grapple with issues including where in the United States prisoners might be moved and what courts they could be tried in. It also provides for a new diplomatic effort to transfer some of the remaining men, including more than 60 that the Bush administration had cleared for release.

    The order also directs an immediate assessment of the prison itself to ensure that the men are held in conditions that meet the humanitarian requirements of the Geneva Convention. That provision appeared to be a pointed embrace of the international treaties that the Bush administration often argued did not apply to detainees captured in the war against terrorism.

    The seven years of the detention camp have included four suicides, hunger strikes by scores of detainees, and accusations of extensive use of solitary confinement and abusive interrogations, which the Department of Defense has long denied. Last week a senior Pentagon official said she had concluded that interrogators at Guantánamo had tortured one detainee, who officials have said was a would-be "20th hijacker" in the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

    The report of Thursday's expected announcement came after the new administration late Tuesday night ordered an immediate halt to the military commission proceedings for prosecuting detainees at Guantánamo and filed a request in Federal District Court in Washington to stay habeas corpus proceedings there. Government lawyers described both delays as necessary for the administration to make a broad assessment of detention policy.

    The cases immediately affected include those of five detainees charged as the coordinators of the 2001 attacks, including the case against Mohammed, the self-described mastermind.

    The decision to stop the commissions was described by the military prosecutors as a pause in the war-crimes system "to permit the newly inaugurated president and his administration time to review the military commission process generally and the cases currently pending before the military commissions, specifically."

    More than 200 detainees' habeas corpus cases have been filed in federal court, and lawyers said they expected that all of the cases would be stayed.

    Obama had suggested in the campaign that, in place of military commissions, he would prefer prosecutions in federal courts or, perhaps, in the existing military justice system, which provides legal guarantees similar to those of American civilian courts.

    Some human rights groups and lawyers for detainees said they were concerned about the one-year timetable. "It only took days to put these men in Guantánamo, it shouldn't take a year to get them out," said Vincent Warren, the executive director of the Center for Constitutional Rights in New York, which has coordinated detainees' lawyers.

    But several groups that had criticized the Bush administration's policies applauded the rapid moves by the new administration. Obama's actions "reaffirmed American values and are a ray of light after eight long, dark years," said Anthony Romero, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union.

    Correction:

    Notes:

    International Herald Tribune Copyright © 2009 The International Herald Tribune | www.iht.com
    12월 9일

    Interesting story

    Terrorists' Restless Leg Syndrome
    11/26/2008

    I thought the rest of the world was going to love us if we elected B. Hussein Obama! Somebody better tell the Indian Muslims. As everyone but President-elect B. Hussein Obama's base knows, many of the Guantanamo detainees cannot be sent to their home countries, cannot be released and cannot be tried. They need to be held in some form of extra-legal limbo the rest of their lives, sort of like Phil Spector.
       
    And now they're Obama's problem.
       
    If Obama wants his detention of Islamic terrorists to be dramatically different from Bush's Guantanamo, my suggestion is that he cut off -- so to speak -- the expensive prosthetic limb procedures now being granted the detained terrorists.
    Sponsored Links:
    &amp;lt;script language="JavaScript" type="text/javascript"&amp;gt; document.write('&amp;lt;a VCIGNORE href="http://ads.he.valueclick.net/redirect?host=h0004493;size=300x250;t=js;c=00;target_id=0;banner=a0118957;vcurlpreserve=http://clk.atdmt.com/INV/go/hmnvnfsi0110000057inv/direct/01-1228831155.6500404" target="_blank"&amp;gt;&amp;lt;img src="http://view.atdmt.com/INV/view/hmnvnfsi0110000057inv/direct/01-1228831155.6500404"&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;'); &amp;lt;/SCRIPT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;noscript&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href="http://ads.he.valueclick.net/redirect?host=h0004493;size=300x250;t=js;c=00;target_id=0;banner=a0118957;vcurlpreserve=http://clk.atdmt.com/INV/go/hmnvnfsi0110000057inv/direct/011228831155.6500404" target="_blank"&amp;gt;&amp;lt;img border="0" src="http://view.atdmt.com/INV/view/hmnvnfsi0110000057inv/direct/01-1228831155.6500404" /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/noscript&amp;gt; Click here to visit our sponsor


       
    Far from being sodomized and tortured by U.S. forces -- as Obama's base has wailed for the past seven years -- the innocent scholars and philanthropists being held at Guantanamo have been given expensive, high-tech medical procedures at taxpayer expense. If we're not careful, multitudes of Muslims will be going to fight Americans in Afghanistan just so they can go to Guantanamo and get proper treatment for attention deficit disorder and erectile dysfunction.
       
    After being captured fighting with Taliban forces against Americans in 2001, Abdullah Massoud was sent to Guantanamo, where the one-legged terrorist was fitted with a special prosthetic leg, at a cost of $50,000-$75,000 to the U.S. taxpayer. Under the Americans With Disabilities Act, Massoud would now be able to park his car bomb in a handicapped parking space!
       
    No, you didn't read that wrong, because the VA won't pay for your new glasses. I said $75,000. I would have gone with hanging at sunrise, but what do I know?
       
    Upon his release in March 2004, Massoud hippity-hopped back to Afghanistan and quickly resumed his war against the U.S. Aided by his new artificial leg, just months later, in October 2004, Massoud masterminded the kidnapping of two Chinese engineers in Pakistan working on the Gomal Zam Dam project.
       
    This proved, to me at least, that people with disabilities can do anything they put their minds to. Way to go, you plucky extremist!
       
    Massoud said he had nothing against the Chinese but wanted to embarrass Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf for cooperating with the Americans. You know, the Americans who had just footed -- you should pardon the expression -- a $75,000 bill for his prosthetic leg.
       
    Pakistani forces stormed Massoud's hideout, killing all the kidnappers, including Massoud. Only one of the Chinese engineers was rescued alive.
       
    As a result of the kidnapping, the Chinese pulled all 100 engineers and dam workers out of Pakistan, and work on the dam ceased. This was bad news for the people of Pakistan -- but good news for the endangered Pakistani snail darter!
       
    In none of the news accounts I read of Massoud's return to jihad after his release from Guantanamo is there any mention of the fact that his prosthetic leg was acquired in Guantanamo, courtesy of American taxpayers after he was captured trying to kill Americans on the battlefield in Afghanistan.
       
    News about the prosthetic leg might interfere with stories of the innocent aid workers being held captive at Guantanamo in George Bush's AmeriKKKa.
       
    To the contrary, although Massoud's swashbuckling reputation as a jihadist with a prosthetic leg appears in many news items, where he got that leg is almost purposely hidden -- even lied about.
       
    "Abdullah Massoud ... had earned both sympathy and reverence for his time in Guantanamo Bay. ... Upon his release, he made it home to Waziristan and resumed his war against the U.S. With his long hair, his prosthetic limb and impassioned speeches, he quickly became a charismatic inspiration to Waziristan's youth." -- The New York Times
       
    He's not a one-legged terrorist -- he's a freedom fighter living with a disability. I think we could all learn something about courage from this man.
       
    "He lost his leg in a landmine explosion a few days before the fall of Kabul to the Taliban in September 1996. It didn't dampen his enthusiasm as a fighter and he got himself an artificial leg later, says Yusufzai." -- The Indo-Asian News Service
       
    Where? At COSTCO?
       
    "The 29-year-old Massoud, who lost his left leg in a landmine explosion while fighting alongside the Taliban, often used to ride a horse or camel because his disability made it painful for him to walk long distances in hilly areas." -- BBC Monitoring South Asia
       
    Side-saddle, I'm guessing. And you just know those caves along the Afghan-Pakistan border aren't wheelchair accessible.
       
    "He was educated in Peshawar and was treated in Karachi after his left leg was blown up in a landmine explosion in the Wreshmin Tangi gorge near Kabul in September 1996. He now walks with an artificial leg specifically made for him in Karachi." -- Gulf News (United Arab Emirates)
       
    Karachi? Hey, how do I get into this guy's HMO?
       
    They can't lick leprosy in Karachi, but the Gulf News tells us Massoud got his artificial leg at one of their specialty hospitals.
       
    Anyone who thinks the Guantanamo detainees can be released without consequence doesn't have a leg to stand on.
    12월 3일

    More on Mushy

     I am staying in Pakistan, says Musharraf

    Tuesday, December 02, 2008

    By Daphne Barak

    LONDON: “President would love to see you” I was told a rainy Sunday afternoon in London. I went to see Musharraf. Frankly, I was as intrigued to see him as he was intrigued to see me. It is very known that the late Benazir Bhutto was like a big sister to me, and I warned her not to go back to Pakistan. Funny enough—from different reasons—he did the same.

    We met Sunday afternoon in a private flat in a London location I cannot disclose. The only thing I can say that it was the last location one would have in mind to meet a former president. On the other hand—I have met the late Benazir and her widower Asif in a similar location while they were exiled.

    Musharraf was dressed as casual as my producer Erbil and I were. He was wearing a burgundy sweater. The flat we met was very much secured. His people were waiting for us at an agreed meeting point to take us to him.

    Musharraf looked so much younger, trimmed, relaxed than I rememberÖ His hairdo was too long. He came across as almost BohemianÖ We kissed each other. Musharraf—polished politician? Or—the westernised leader—asked me about Amy Winehouse. Realising that I am nursing my voice, I was immediately served a hot tea with milk. We were discussing the last time we met, while he closed the roads for me and made my presence in Pakistan very confidential. That was not the case famously last time when I was in Pakistan as a guest of Asif Ali ZardariÖ So Musharraf—obviously asking with sarcasm: “Daphne you are so popular in Pakistan! When are you coming back to Pakistan?”

    DB: So where do you live right now?

    PM: I still live in Rawalpindi. In the same house you came to interview me and my wife. We are all there.

    DB: Is this where you are going to live?

    PM: No, noÖ only until the construction on my house in Islamabad finishes.

    DB: So what are you doing right now?

    PM: I just finished reading my own book. I needed to reflect.

    DB: Was your book successful?

    PM: I don’t know if the book was successful. I think it was because of the media, but I need to look at the numbers of the publishing house to know how much they sold.

    DB: While usually in the publishing world, you should be happy with the advance you getÖ. Are you writing a sequel?

    PM: Yes, I am thinking to write another book. And—to go on the lecture circuits.

    DB: Did you start writing the book yet?

    PM: Not yet. The whole situation in Pakistan got me and others in a state of shock.

    DB: Like hitting bottom!

    PM: Yes, like hitting bottom. And I agree with you Daphne that after hitting bottom—maybe better things would happen.

    DB: Did you sort out your lecture circuits?

    PM: Not yetÖ I am going to start doing it. I am just looking for the right timing and right representative for me.

    DB: Do you feel secure in Pakistan right now?

    PM: I would not leave Pakistan. It is my home. Am I safe there completely? Of course not. If there are risks but it is not new for me to live with risk. The Army is protecting me. But of course—everything is possible.

    DB: Do you intend to stay in Pakistan?

    PM: Of course! My son went back to California but I have a daughter who lives in Karachi. She organises musical events. Pakistan is my country. The country is in a very bad shape. I brought foreign investments. I built roads. Nobody invests there anymore.

    I am joking with Musharraf that unlike his predecessors, he is the first ruler of Pakistan that has not been executed, put in jail or exiled.

    PM: I know you are getting a lot of emails from people who would like to have me back. You told me so! With the current situation in Pakistan it is difficult for them to contact me. I care about my country and I hope you can come and visit without streets being closed around you.

    DB: You know Benazir was close to me, like a big sister.

    PM: YesÖ I knew. I also understood what you were doing with your interview with Sanam Bhutto, tribute with Bilawal and so on. You were helping Zardari to win the elections!

    DB: I thought I was helping democracy in Pakistan. That’s what Asif kept telling meÖ

    PM: (Musharraf smiles) Well, you are getting lots of feedback from the people of Pakistan. You just told me yourself even members of the PPP (Bhutto’s party) are very disappointed (from Zardari’s conduct).

    DB: The frustration conveyed to me, in all these emails, is because of the declining economy and the escalating violence.

    PM: This kind of violence has never happened during my timeÖ I made my mind early on that I was going with America against terrorism. I have done anything in my power to block terrorists and fundamentalists. There is only one way to deal with terrorists—to fight them.

    DB: Now, on top of it the mess with IndiaÖ

    PM: Well, you know if you don’t fight terror and make sure everybody knows how strong you feel about it you may have problems with other countries like America. And Yes—now the situation with India. This is what terror is all about. By now—it has become a very complicated situation.

    DB: You mean that if the current administration would have made it clear how strong they are fighting against terrorism the tension between India and Pakistan wouldn’t have occurred?

    PM: (Nodding in agreement) you said itÖ

    DB: One of Zardari’s partners called me desperately recently that he is so upset that he is suicidal and that he is losing his balance.

    PM: You mean Zardari’s media partner? He may have lost his balance because he may have drunk too much.

    DB: Do you miss the good all days when you were in power?

    PM: Not at all! I have found time to spend with my family and friends. But I do care about Pakistan. It is obvious that I keep watching what is going on.

    DB: Do you have any message to the people of Pakistan?

    PM: WellÖ you told me you were going to send me some of the many emails you get from Pakistani people who are going through pains because of the current situation. I would love to!

    DB: Especially young people!

    PM: Yeah, I would love to communicate with them. Please doÖ

    DB: Actually—many emails are very flattering to you, even some from PPP members.

    PM: Yeah?

    DB: Many emails are relatively flattering to you. I even have emails from PPP members who say that they never thought they will miss you, but they do.

    PM: (Musharraf laughing) the problem is that the media in Pakistan always shows negative images. I don’t watch TV too often, but whenever I do—they show people beating each other, violence in the streets, what kind of image does it give to Pakistan in the eyes of the world.

    DB: Isn’t the media supposed to report news worthy events?

    PM: Yes, but in a more balanced responsible way.

    Towards the end, we mentioned few names of leaders. Musharraf says that he still feels welcomed among them, not the loneliness which comes usually after separation from power. For example—Turkey: “Prime Minister Erdogan has been a very close friend. He is my friend.” So a friendly Musharraf promises to call me soon and returns to the fragile country he left behind.
    11월 11일

    Danville, a new kind of American town

    With international attention, is Danville’s economy bouncing back?

    BY SARAH ARKIN
    Media General News Service

    Published: June 25, 2008

    As Danville and Pittsylvania County make front-page stories in national media outlets, city and county officials point out a beneficial correlation between positive media coverage and economic growth.

    In just one month, the Richmond Times-Dispatch, The Washington Post and BusinessWeek ran features on the region’s collaboration and success in luring international companies and driving economic development.

    Now, the Washington bureau of Al Jazeera television is considering Danville for a documentary on so-called reverse globalization - international companies moving into the United States and inverting the trend of global outsourcing that effectively devastated Danville’s economy.

    “I definitely think that the announcements (of new international companies wanting to operate in Danville) and media coverage continue to feed one another,” said Laurie Moran, president of the Danville Pittsylvania County Chamber of Commerce.

    “The interest and inquiries that we have in this office continue to spike whenever there is media attention,” she said. “I think there’s a direct correlation.”

    In describing how “scrappy little Danville refused to give up on itself,” The Washington Post used the opening of Swedwood, the manufacturing subsidiary of Swedish furniture retailer IKEA, to focus on the role of international companies in the revitalization of this former mill town.

    Leading the story with Swedwood’s grand opening and quoting Swedwood officials singing Danville’s praises makes other companies interested in Southside, Danville Economic Development Director Jeremy Stratton said.

    “It snowballed ever since the Swedwood grand opening,” he said. “We’re getting a lot more attention in general. ...We’ll keep moving forward.”

    With an international viewership, a potential Al Jazeera story highlights the truly global aspect of the area’s revitalization, city officials said.

    “I think it’s indicative of what we’ve been able to achieve on a global level,” said retiring Danville City Manager Jerry Gwaltney, who has traveled all over the world in hopes of convincing companies to set up shot in Danville.

    “International recognition has helped,” he said.

    Sarah Arkin is a staff writer for the Danville Register & Bee in Danville, Va

    11월 9일

    I know

    I know I just can't get enough of this Debbie Schlussel lady. But the next two post after the elections are too good to just not keep a copy of.
    I'm loving it.
    POST #1

    Debbie Schlussel: America Elects the Vibe Magazine President . . . With Some Help From Little Beirut

    By Debbie Schlussel

    My friend, Linda, says that America elected the "American Idol" President, yesterday. But--as the trite saying goes--America elected "The Vibe Magazine" President . . . with a little help from a mob of Hezbollah members who now dominate Dearbornistan politics. obamavibepresident.jpg dearbornobamavoter.jpg Little Beirut Goes For Obama: Dahan Alnajjar Votes in Dearbornistan's 7th Precinct
    Posted by Debbie on November 5, 2008 09:44 AM to Debbie Schlussel


    11월 8일

    Won't go down quietly

    They just won't go down quietly. Had to find something to find something to deflect the attention away from the fact that they had just lost.

    -------------------------------------

    Debbie Schlussel: Sadness: John McCain Concedes, While Detroit FOX News Affiliate Cuts Away to Video of Obama Supporters' Gyrations

    By Debbie Schlussel

    **** SCROLL DOWN FOR UPDATE ****

    John McCain just finished delivering his concession speech. It's the classiest, most gracious, most heart-felt concession speeches I've ever heard. The guy is a mensch. It was a great speech, well delivered, and sad to hear. If only it was a victory speech.

    Also, sad: Detroit's FOX News affiliate, which is owned and operated by FOX News' NewsCorp, cut away to scenes of urban Obama supporters doing victory dances and assorted "Soul Train"-style gyrations, while Senator McCain was delivering his concession speech. The audio was the McCain speech, but the video was the Obama hip-hoppers acting like they were in a Diddy video.

    Rude, obnoxious, and disgusting on the part of FOX 2 News. Credit that to FOX 2's classless News Director Dana Kennedy Hahn.

    **** UPDATE, 11/05/08: Reader Jim of Rouge Revival writes:

    Read your piece this a.m. ... and wanted to let you know that I was actually watching the Detroit Fox News Affiliate (Fox 2 Detroit) last night ... when they made the executive bone-head decision of the century, to show the "soul train gyration" celebration in Grant Park while John McCain was giving his concession speech. I was appalled as well and followed up this morning with both a phone call to the station, and a certified letter, documenting my disgust AND my choice to now get my local news from Channel 7 Detroit.

    Posted by Debbie on November 4, 2008 11:28 PM to Debbie Schlussel

    10월 26일

    Some scary stuff

    Reading America’s mind-Dr Farrukh Saleem

    America’s Pakistan-policy, or more appropriately Musharraf-policy, was fabricated by Vice President Dick Cheney, at the Old Executive Office Building, with input from the US Department of State at the Harry S Truman Building. Then came July 2008 and it all changed.

    In July, the Indian embassy in Kabul was bombed. In July, the United States Senate confirmed US Army General Petraeus as commander of US Central Command (CENTCOM). In July, the prime minister of Pakistan, under Rule 3(3) of the Rules of Business of 1973, placed the ISI under the administrative, financial and operation control of the Interior Division (and withdrew the order the following morning). In July, the New York Times, quoting CIA sources, alleged “links between members of the spy service, the Directorate of Inter-Services Intelligence, or the ISI, and the militant network led by Maulavi Jalaluddin Haqqani (a major reshuffle in the army had become inevitable after all this).”

    In July, the turf battle between the Department of State and the Department of Defence over Pakistan was won by Defence. Dick Cheney lost out to Robert Gates, the 22nd US secretary of defence, and (General) Michael Hayden, the 20th director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). From that point onwards, it was the CIA flying MQ-9 and RQ-9 predator unmanned aerial vehicles into Pakistani air space and General Petraeus had become the chief architect of America’s war strategy in this region.

    Pakistani decision makers have failed to read America’s changing policy dynamics. They went begging to Saudi Arabia for the Saudi Oil Facility when the facility had to be negotiated in Washington. We went begging to President Bush when Bush had become a lame duck and Pakistan policy was being run out of the Department of Defence. We went begging to China when China did not dare become an obstacle to American national interests in Pakistan.

    Clearly, America wants something from Pakistan that Pakistan is either not willing or incapable of delivering. In the meanwhile, the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) claims that its net reserves amount to $4.3 billion which — after accounting for gold and dollar repo agreements — may in effect be a mere billion dollars or so. In essence, the SBP may not have enough money to pay for the following month’s oil imports. Then there’s interest payment on Pakistan bond falling due for payment in December and a $500 million principal repayment due in another three months. While all this goes on in Pakistan, America has to take care of her own worst recession since the Great Depression.

    On October 14, parts of the new National Intelligence Estimates (NIEs) were leaked to McClatchy (32 daily newspapers and a total circulation of 3.3 million). Apparently, the NIE’s conclusion on the state of Pakistan is: “no money, no energy, no government.” Now, that is scary: “no government” in a nuclear-armed state.

    On the other side of the border, all that General Petraeus has is one combat brigade. Petraeus cannot do much but buy time till he has at least three additional combat brigades. On September 23, Robert Gates said that Pakistan was facing an “existential threat.” On October 31, Petraeus shall be taking over CENTCOM’s command and get an additional combat brigade by December and two more by the summer of 2009. Petraeus will then be in a position to negotiate and that too from a position of strength.

    November 4 is election day in America. In December, the SBP must pay interest due on its dollar bonds. On January 20, a new president of the United States will take office and whether it’s Obama or McCain South Asia’s war theatre is going to expand. In February, the SBP must pay back $500 million on a maturing dollar bond.

    The writer is an Islamabad-based freelance columnist farrukh15@hotmail.com

    Source: The News, 26/10/2008

    10월 24일

    Obama wants to reach out to Pakistanis

    Obama wants to reach out to Pakistanis

    CHICAGO: Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama says he will reach out to the Pakistani people to build a lasting relationship, rather than look for temporary alliances with their government.

    In an exclusive interview with IANS, Obama acknowledged that the US and Pakistan must continue fighting terrorism together, but said working for the peopleís social and economic welfare is important.

    “While the US and Pakistan must continue to work together to combat terrorism that has claimed innocent lives in both countries and to destroy the terrorist sanctuaries along the Afghan-Pakistan border, I will make helping Pakistan tackle critical challenges like illiteracy, poverty, and lack of healthcare a key priority, by increasing aid in these areas,” Obama said.

    In what could be seen as a contrast to the Bush administrationís Pakistan policy that appeared to stress relations with the Musharrafís military regime, Obama said: “I will stand up for democratic institutions, civil society and judicial independence in Pakistan.”

    Underlining the orientation that an Obama administration will take if he is elected, he said: “I want to build a broad-based and lasting relationship with the people of Pakistan - not just temporary alliances with their government.”

    He added: “I co-sponsored legislation with Senator Lugar to triple non-military assistance to Pakistan and sustain it for the next decade.” “If we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets and President Musharraf does not act, we will,” Obama said. But now with Pervez Musharraf gone, he emphasised in this interview: “Working together with Pakistan to destroy the terrorist sanctuaries along the Afghan-Pakistan border.”

    http://www.opfblog.com/5248/obama-wants-to-reach-out-to-pakistanis/#more-5248

    The News, 24/10/2008

    10월 20일

    Colin Powell Endorses Obama for President

    Quite unbelievable that this is happening. Amazing!
    Video of the interview below

    Quote

    YouTube - Colin Powell Endorses Obama for President
     

    Jews joke for Obama -- and they're serious

    Jews joke for Obama -- and they're serious
    http://www.arabtimesonline.com/client/pagesdetails.asp?nid=23707&ccid=18 

    NEW YORK, Oct 20, 2008 (AFP) - Heard about the black guy and the Jewish grandma? Or the strange contents of John McCain's fridge?

    Jewish Democrats fear Barack Obama is losing ground in the Jewish community to Republican McCain, especially in the key state of Florida, and they're fighting back -- with jokes.

    Shock comic Sarah Silverman is urging young Jews to make a 'Great Schlep' to their conservative grandparents in Florida and persuade them to vote Obama, the first African-American with a serious chance to become president.

    In a skit on www.greatschlep.com, seen by seven million Internet viewers, Silverman lists similarities between a young black man and a Jewish retiree: love of tracksuits, Cadillacs, jewelry.

    'They both say 'yo' all the time, or Jews go right to left and say 'oy,'' Silverman quips. Oh, and 'all their friends are dying.'

    The jokey appeal, littered with swear words, has a serious message.

    Jews traditionally vote overwhelmingly Democratic, but Obama's share has slipped.

    Opinion polls show him with only about 60 percent of Jewish support nationwide, well below Democrat John Kerry's approximately 75 percent in the 2004 election that he lost to George W. Bush.

    That shift could make a difference in a tight contest -- particularly in the ultra-tight finish predicted in Florida, a state crucial to McCain's strategy and where about five percent of the vote is Jewish.

    'If Barack Obama doesn't become the next president of the United States, I'm going to blame the Jews,' Silverman deadpans in her video.

    Analysts say conservative Jews -- who are just as likely to be young as old -- dislike Obama because of his race and his relatively doveish foreign policy platform.

    Perhaps the single most controversial issue for Obama among Jews is his desire to negotiate with Israel's enemy Iran, rather than continue Washington's current hard-line policies.

    He also suffers from an exotic name and the lingering effect of a whispering campaign by opponents that he secretly practices Islam.

    'You know why your grandparents don't like Barack Obama?' Silverman asks. 'Because his name sounds scary, it sounds Moslem, which he's obviously not.'

    At an Obama fundraiser thrown this week by hip young New York Jews, comedians delivered a string of below-the-belt attacks on Republicans.

    Gabe Liedman and Jenny Slate conjured a crude scenario involving a hungry McCain and a bra in his fridge and they said his wife Cindy was a witch.

    'If you say 'Cindy McCain' three times she appears out of the mirror and traps your soul in one of her many diamond necklaces,' Slate said.

    But when Seth Herzog took the stage, the defensiveness about Obama, albeit with humor, returned.

    'If you know anything about Obama, one thing you know is he's not an Arab,' Herzog said in mock exasperation. 'He's a black guy, ladies and gentlemen!'

    The 'Great Schlep' has had more media success than impact on the ground. So far only about 100 Jews have travelled to Florida and another 100 to other states.

    However, several hundred more are expected to make the journey, said one of the organizers, Mik Moore of the Jewish Council for Education and Research.

    'Even if this is not a huge number, you win elections through accumulative effort,' Moore said.

    Arlynn Greenbaum, 59, a literary agent in New York, said her 81-year-old mother, who lives in Florida, had been a typical hold-out.

    'She doesn't trust Obama. I'd say she's prejudiced. We've had arguments, screaming arguments,' Greenbaum said.'

    'Finally last weekend when we had our weekly phone call, she said, 'OK -- I'll vote Obama.''

    Watch out, though, says Joshua Neuman, publisher of Heeb magazine.

    'Jewish grandparents can be very sneaky. I don't trust them when they say 'I'll vote Obama.' That's the big X factor.'


    http://www.thegreatschlep.com/site/index.html