Faraz님의 프로필Faraz's Blog사진블로그리스트기타 ![]() | 도움말 |
|
|
10월 24일 Intelligent people Most interesting statistics found in last week's Lexington column in the ECONOMIST. Yet a poll last month found that most Americans would rather their government did less. Some 57% said it was doing too many things that were better left to individuals and businesses. Only 38% thought it should do more. The proportion who believe that government over-regulates private businesses has also risen from 38% to 45% in a year. And despite the attention lavished on Michael Moore’s new movie excoriating capitalism, only 24% of Americans think firms are under-regulated. Totally crazy, people think that bank and corporations should have less regulation. Wow. 10월 7일 Glenn Beck He tells viewers that Obama's volunteerism efforts are really an attempt to create a "civilian national-security force that is just as strong , just as powerful as the military." 10월 4일 Sheldon Adelson Wow, was reading an old Time on the loo today. Came across this article about Las Vegas and how it has come to be hit really hard by the recession. Condos that were selling for 600,000 dollars last year are now selling for less than 200,000. How crazy is that. Anyway the reason it was a worthwhile article, so much so that I logged into here to write a bit about it is this casino owner Adelson. This guy was worth 40 billion last year apparently and now is worth 4 billion. But I guess what difference it makes, once you're past the 100s of million mark would it really make much difference to your lifestyle? The article says it does, read underline part at the bottom. Funny, I kinda would want to know more about it. Seems like quite a character. That is true even of Sheldon Adelson, who has lost more during this recession than anyone else on the planet. The 76-year-old chairman of the Las Vegas Sands Corp., which owns the Venetian hotel, the Sands Expo and Convention Center and the Venetian Macao, was in 2007 and '08 the third richest person in the world, with — by his estimate — a net worth of $40 billion. By February of this year, he said he had lost $36.5 billion — more than the GDP of half of the countries in the world. In the years before that slide, banks were begging him to take their money, given his massive success in building the first Vegas-style hotel and casino in Macao, China, in 2004. Adelson didn't hesitate, taking all he could get and building an entire mini-Vegas in Macao called the Cotai Strip, along with huge casinos in Singapore; he also doubled his Vegas space by adding the Palazzo to his Venetian hotel. In a short time, he has accumulated a debt-to-earnings ratio of 6.8 to 1 in the U.S. Then the loans stopped coming, and his stock price sank from $144 to $1.42 in March. (It now hovers at about $12.) He doesn't seem too crushed by his losses. "A billion dollars doesn't buy what it used to. So it's not as tragic as one would assume," he says. "I say to my wife that the worst tragedy I could have in business deserves a two-hour cry, and I scale down from there. I didn't cry one moment." When his wife asked him to cut back on expenses, he dismissed the suggestion, telling her he still had more money than they could ever spend. Eventually he capitulated: whenever possible, he uses his small private jet instead of his big one. 9월 23일 Khwaja and Ijaz-ul-Haq get personal - Exposing Each Other! PLEASE CLICK PLAY BUTTON > Quote YouTube - Khwaja and Ijaz-ul-Haq get personal - Exposing Each Other! 8월 6일 Gojra An excellent article about the recent burning and killing of Christians in Gojra. Thank god some people in Pakistan are not scared to oppose Sipah-e-Sahaba.
6월 30일 Go TutuDecember 27, 1989
Tutu Urges Israelis to Pray for and Forgive NazisBy ALAN COWELL, Special to The New York Times
Archbishop Desmond M. Tutu of Cape Town, the Anglican Primate of Southern Africa, urged Israelis today to pray for and forgive those responsible for the Nazi genocide. ''Our Lord would say that in the end the positive thing that can come is the spirit of forgiving, not forgetting, but the spirit of saying: God, this happened to us,'' the South African cleric said after visiting Jerusalem's Yad Vashem Holocaust memorial. ''We pray for those who made it happen, help us to forgive them and help us so that we in our turn will not make others suffer,'' he said in what he described as the message he would offer to the descendants of those who suffered the Nazi crime that took six million Jewish lives. The comments were the latest in a series of statements that Israelis have found irksome on a four-day Christmas pilgrimage to the Holy Land by the South African cleric. He has condemned what he called Israeli oppression and compared Israel's handling of the Palestinians to South Africa's treatment of blacks. Shortly before the Archbishop met today with the Israeli Religious Affairs Minister, Zevulun Hammer, protesters scrawled the words ''Tutu is a Nazi'' on the ministry wall. Earlier, others had written: ''Black Nazi pig'' on the walls of St. George's Cathedral in Arab East Jerusalem, where the Archbishop was staying. Other Israelis have said he has displayed bias by failing to meet with other Israeli leaders. But he remained undeterred by the criticism. ''If I met your Prime Minister, I would make exactly the same point,'' he told reporters. ''I would say to him that I cannot myself understand people who have suffered as the Jews have suffered inflicting the suffering of the kind I have seen on the Palestinians.'' ''The land that gave birth to the Prince of Peace is wracked by violence, hatred and hostility,'' he said. Mr. Hammer, the Religious Affairs Minister, said there was ''some kind of misunderstanding in his statements about Israel.'' One Government official, however, seemed heartened by the furor. ''We thought he might have made trouble for us,'' the official said. ''But he has damaged himself.'' But church officials said the Archbishop's comments were consistent with Christian doctrine of forgiveness of adversaries. One official, who asked not to be identified, said the comments would nevertheless anger Israelis living with the memory of the Nazi crime. In an interview earlier, Archbishop Tutu urged that economic sanctions against his country be applied ''rigorously and intensively'' and said President F. W. de Klerk had not yet offered sufficient concessions to the black majority to merit easing of the measures. Since anti-Government protest erupted in the mid-1980's in South Africa, the United States, Western European nations and the Commonwealth, the association of former British colonies, have all ordered an array of economic restrictions supposed to limit South African access to credit and overseas markets. Israel has a close strategic relationship with South Africa's white leaders and is thus branded by some South African blacks as an implicit supporter of apartheid rule. The South African cleric has been at the forefront of the long-running campaign by his country's black majority to end rule by the white minority. ''Mr de Klerk is a more personable individual,'' he replied when asked to compare the two white leaders. ''He is someone who appears to me to listen. He does smile more. He doesn't wave his finger.'' Moreover, he said, the South African President, who assumed power earlier this year, ''has done certain things that has given some space.'' ''These are things that we want to acknowledge,'' he said, listing the release of some prominent political prisoners, the desgregation of beaches and a decision not to block some anti-apartheid demonstrations. Archbishop Tutu continued: ''He does not seem in my view to have a coherent, precise program of how he intends to dismantle apartheid. We are still sitting with a state of emergency. We are still sitting with severe restrictions on the media.'' 6월 25일 Obama knows his stuff
2월 9일 AMAZING ARTICLELost Imaginations*Jump to Comments
Sixty one years have gone by but the creation of Pakistan is still a
heated debate: contested, fractured and bitter. That history has been
the preserve of the victors and the powerful is well known. But to spin
and whirl the truth to the extent that it becomes empty and farcical is
an art form practiced by the Pakistani state and its mock-historians. To support this position, Dr Ayesha Jalal’s seminal work, ‘The Sole Spokesman’ was cited by the Urdu columnist. Dr Jalal, in her outstanding book, has captured the nuances of partition history and presented an interpretation that is unbiased and brings forth the complexities of the Indian Muslim community. This community was by no means the monolith Jinnah had to contend with. No sooner was this column published than a barrage of protests appeared in the press, authored by holier-than-thou writers who thought that this was an insult to the concept of Pakistan and that Jinnah was determined on creating Pakistan come hell or high water. The debate intensified, and as is the case in Pakistan came down to personal invective and attacks on Dr Jalal. Among others, a key conspiracy theory articulated was that her supervisor at Cambridge University was a ‘Hindu’ who must have misled her to undo the foundations of the holy project called Pakistan. This was a ludicrous charge and betrayed our penchant to undermine scholarship and history. Dr Jalal’s book, if anything, elucidates Jinnah’s towering personality and qualities of leadership and negotiation in full measure. Her book revisits onerous challenges that Jinnah faced in negotiating for the political rights of the Muslims in a post-British India. Like most historical events, Pakistan was not a project cast in stone or a divine scheme, as our mock-historians sponsored by the state and its moribund institutions would have us believe. I was quite perturbed as I followed this debate. Over the last two decades, one had thought, a more nuanced understanding of Jinnah had gained currency in Pakistan’s popular imagination. Alas, it remains nothing but a case of lost imagination. The reason for this poverty of intellect and imagination is rooted in the distortion of history and its flagrant abuse by the ruling classes of Pakistan. Is it not clear by now who benefited the most out of Pakistan’s creation – the bureaucrats of United Pakistan, the mercantile class of Bombay and Gujerat, the feudals of Sindh and the Punjab, or the Pakistan Army? Popular support for Pakistan was widespread amongst East Bengalis who we were quick to dispose of, as they wanted a Pakistan that was plural, democratic, non-feudal and socially just. Of course our official historians would not see this. They cast aspersions on anyone trying to unpack the mess caused by partition – its bloodline is as fresh as ever. Look at the state of Indo-Pak relations. The demonising of Hindus is as fervent as the demonising of Muslims by the Hindutva brigades in India. Jinnah was not of this ilk. His wife was a Parsi, many of his close friends were Hindus and his daughter married a Parsi and did not move to her father’s new homeland. Could anything be more tragic than this? Jinnah certainly did not envisage the martial state, engineered to destroy India, that we are today. This applies to India as well, where Gandhi and Nehru could never have promoted a nuclear dénouement in the subcontinent. In several interviews, Jinnah talked of going to India for vacations, and even moving there after retirement. The properties in Delhi and Bombay owned by Jinnah were kept intact for this purpose. Contrary to popular distortion, Jinnah even accepted his son-in-law, and there is a small monograph, a young historian tells me, in a US library, that was authored by Dina Jinnah, in which she testifies to her father’s softening up towards his non-Muslim son-in-law, to whom he had apparently presented a cap. Pakistan’s grand old historian K K Aziz who is unwell now and lacks any means of support to finish his important projects, told me how Fatima Jinnah’s little book on her brother had been censored by these very masters of state power. What was the fuss all about? Well, Fatima Jinnah had not been too kind about Liaquat Ali Khan and a few other heroes of the Pakistan movement. If anything, many of the heroes were rank opportunists, power-seeking fief-holders, who all jumped onto the Pakistan ship when it became clear to them that this was the land where they would make good, without competition from more qualified Hindus. And the good times continue to roll. I want to index all the last
[feudal] names of the 1946 Constituent Assembly members and see how
their progeny keep on going in the centers of power. This is beyond
tragedy and beyond farce. True, we inherited the worst of geographical locations and a ‘moth-eaten’ country to quote Jinnah. But by writing false histories and nurturing delusions of grandeur we have become a delusional society. We want Islam, modernity, the Taliban and Bollywood, all at the same time. We loathe America but the queues for American visas are longer than ever. We continue to search for our identity: we are by turns Central Asian, Persian and Arab and turn our backs on our closest approximation which is Indian. The one thing we know is that we are not Indian. We claim the Mughals as our own, but ignore the fact that most of them were secular and born of Hindu mothers. We love invaders and name missiles after them, but refuse to acknowledge that most Pakistanis were converts from lower caste Hindus. There appears to be no discipline of history – academic or popular – worth its name in Pakistan. The great empire of missiles, jihadis and opportunists has left no space for independent voices, and scholarship is stymied by state pressure or its proxy goons masquerading as patriots. It is time to revisit history and speak up against decades of lies and constructed histories, if we are to reclaim our future. Raza Rumi blogs at www.razarumi.com <http://www.razarumi.com/> and edits Pak Tea House and Lahore Nama e-zines. 2월 1일 Will people listen to this?http://letusbuildpakistan.blogspot.com/2009/01/swat-muted-protests-wont-do.htmlSwat: Muted protests won’t doMuted protests won’t doBy Zubeida Mustafa PAKISTANIS have perfected the art of protest. Karachi has posters plastered on the walls calling on people to demonstrate their solidarity with the Palestinians in Gaza. In 2007 Musharraf’s coup against the judiciary brought lawyers on to the roads until ‘democracy’ returned to this country. But why are the voices of protest so muted when it comes to Swat? To protest against such tragedies is a duty. And Swat is a tragedy that will ultimately shape the future of Pakistan. Is there something more to the situation in Swat than meets the eye? True, the events there have been overshadowed by the larger picture of the war against terror in Fata and Afghanistan. But that doesn’t mean Swat has little to mourn about. It is not just the slaughter that has left the people speechless. It is the accompanying brutality and ruthlessness that make one’s blood curdle. Obviously, the idea is to spread terror. Some snippets from the press make chilling reading: • The figure for civilian casualties runs into hundreds. • 200,000 of Swat’s 1.7 million population have fled their homes. • The government’s effective writ has receded from the state’s 5,337 sq km to 36 sq km around Mingora. • To terrorise the people, militants resort to a public show of barbarity and instances have been reported of men’s throats being slit and their corpses being left hanging from poles with a warning that they should not be removed. • Women have been ordered to stay home and those defying the ban have been proclaimed prostitutes and slain. • Girls’ schools — the number varies from 170 to 200 — have been torched or bombed and female education prohibited. • Men resisting the Taliban have been declared informers and accomplices of the government and shot dead or have had their property destroyed. • The militants dominate the airwaves and Maulana Fazlullah’s FM radio continues to pour out its retrogressive messages of violence. • Swat today has a visible presence of foreigners from Central Asia. What are they doing there? • People speak of terrorists/training camps operating in the area. • Tourism the mainstay of Swat’s economy is at a standstill. These atrocities are shocking and you wonder why people are silent. And then one voice is raised on the Internet. It is Shaheen Sardar Ali’s, a native of that region who teaches law at the Warwick University. In a poignant piece titled “Will the gula-i-nargis bloom this spring in the Swat valley?” she asks: “How long before we will say: enough is enough and rise, speak and act? How much more suffering before we declare emphatically that we refuse to be harassed and silenced any longer and demand answers for the wrongdoings meted out to us? How many more humans will have to be slaughtered, before we stand up and say NO.” There is method in the madness that has engulfed Swat. This is not simply a battle between two civilisations — one seeking to impose by force its own brand of the Sharia on the people and the other resisting this imposition. If it was just a struggle of this kind, the army with its superior firepower and commitment to defend the writ of the state could easily have checked the insurgency and brought peace to this idyllic valley. The Taliban by and large do not enjoy the support of the population, we are told, and so this is not a classical case of guerrilla conflict which defies conventional strategies of law enforcement. If Swat continues to be in flames even six months after Operation Rah-i-Haq was launched, there is something sinister going on up there. Has the old game of running with the hare and hunting with the hounds returned to the agenda of the defenders of this land? While the army claims it is waging a war against the Taliban, strangely enough the enemy seems to be thriving as it expands its operations. At stake is the credibility of the army which has not been helped by the contradiction between words and deeds that is striking. This is not something we are not familiar with. In his exhaustive study of the Pakistan Army, Crossed Swords, Shuja Nawaz speaks of “local militant groups with shadowy links, past or present, to the ISI”, which was, along with other agencies, “allowed to keep open ties to Islamic groups”. Even in the aftermath of the Mumbai attacks we have the US Assistant Secretary of State for South Asia, Richard Boucher, speaking last week of delinking the Inter Services Intelligence from terrorist groups in Pakistan. We do not know how deep and in which direction these links run. The United States itself is not above all suspicion either. It was known to be engaging the Taliban in Afghanistan in 1997 when Washington was interested in procuring an oil and gas pipeline project for Unocal in that country. Now it wants them decimated. And what about our political parties that now feign to be so powerless in Swat? They have all contributed in one way or another to facilitating the rise of Islamic militancy. Just read what Dr Fazal-ur-Rahim Marwat of the University of Peshawar recounts in his book Talibanisation of Pakistan. According to him, it was in June 1989 that the elders of Malakand convened a meeting of the representatives of all political parties that included the ANP, PPP and PML-N as well as an assortment of religious groups to set up the Tehrik-i-Nifaaz-i-Shariat-i-Muhammadi (TSNM) which chose Maulana Sufi Mohammad of the JI as its leader. The TNSM began gathering strength in 1994 when the PPP was in office in Islamabad and Naseerullah Babar was busy organising the Taliban in Afghanistan.Not to be left behind, it was the PML-N government in its second stint which extended formal recognition to the Taliban regime in Kabul in 1997, clearly indicating its leanings. Today, the ANP presides over the tragedy in Swat. It is difficult to define the changing equations between the numerous stakeholders. Now when the genie is out of the bottle, who will take the blame? The common people of Swat will have to bear the brunt and for many of them the gula-i-nargis will never bloom again, though the crisis is not of their making. (Dawn) zubeidam@gmail.com 1월 30일 Hit the nail on the head ter the Gaza war
Peace now? Jan 22nd 2009
From The Economist print edition At the very least, this is not a bad time to start serious work
FRANCE’S president, Nicolas Sarkozy, has a reputation for letting his enthusiasm run away with him. Having rushed with other European heads of government to the Middle East to douse the flames of Gaza, he returned home with a characteristically grandiose idea. Now that a truce seems to be taking hold, he wants, “within weeks”, to convene a peace conference to begin solving the whole conflict once and for all. Impetuosity can be a dangerous thing in diplomacy. One reason for the failure of Israel and the Palestinians to make peace at Camp David in 2000 was a lack of adequate preparation by Bill Clinton. And Mr Sarkozy would certainly be a fool to rush in before co-ordinating any proposal with Barack Obama. But the French president’s main insight is correct: the aftermath of the Gaza war is as good a moment as any—and maybe even better than many—to breathe new urgency into broader peacemaking in the Middle East. This is because nothing focuses minds faster than a war. Gaza is only the latest bloody reminder that when this particular conflict is left to smoulder, it tends to ignite with a bang, the reverberations of which travel far beyond Palestine itself. The anger on the Arab street has shaken pro-American Arab regimes such as Egypt’s and will hinder Mr Obama’s efforts to open a friendlier chapter in America’s relations with Islam. All of this strengthens the case for Mr Obama to do what he has promised and tackle the Arab-Israeli conflict right away. There is, however, an argument against. This holds that the present circumstances are in fact all wrong. When Mr Clinton was president, the Palestinians still had what they used to call a sole, legitimate representative in the person of Yasser Arafat, who said he accepted the permanence of Israel. How can diplomacy work now that the Palestinians are split between Fatah in the West Bank and, in Gaza, the Islamists of Hamas who say they reject the very idea of peace with a Jewish state? The answer to
this excellent question is not to put diplomacy on hold. Nor is it to
pretend, as George Bush did, that Fatah can make peace with Israel as
though Hamas did not exist. Instead, American, European and Arab
diplomacy should now join forces to mend the Palestinian schism. The
peacemakers are not without tools. Hamas held a hollow “victory” parade
this week (see article),
but Israel’s rampage through Gaza’s streets and skies may have reduced
the allure of “armed struggle” in the eyes of both the movement’s
leaders and its followers. The right mixture of pressure and
inducements, including an end to Gaza’s economic blockade, might well
tempt Hamas back into a unity government, not least because it stands a
fair chance of controlling such a government when next there are
elections in both Gaza and the West Bank.
Would it be a disaster if Hamas won? Only if it stood by its rejectionist creed. Yet Fatah too once called for the destruction of Israel, and changed its mind. Hamas even now sends out enough hints of pragmatism to make it worth seeing whether it can be induced to undertake a similar ideological journey. But—and here is the other immediate job for the peacemakers—Hamas will not be induced to compromise unless the prospect of a Palestinian state begins to look real. To that end, Mr Obama needs to make it clear, preferably before Israel’s election next month, that America will no longer countenance Israel’s colonisation of the West Bank. The Jewish settlements there should never have been built, and Israel has promised to freeze them. This has become a test. If Mr Obama cannot hold Israel to its promise, his chances of restoring America’s standing as the indispensable mediator in this conflict are nil. http://www.economist.com/opinion/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=12972669 1월 22일 Wow, change
Obama to close foreign prisons and Guantánamo
By Mark Mazzetti and William Glaberson
Thursday, January 22, 2009
WASHINGTON: President Barack Obama is expected to take the first steps to undo Bush-era detention policies on Thursday, signing executive orders directing the Central Intelligence Agency to shut what remains of its network of secret prisons and ordering the closing of the Guantánamo detention camp within a year, government officials said. The orders would rewrite American rules for the detention of terrorism suspects. They would require an immediate review of the 245 detainees still held at the naval base in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, to determine if they should be transferred, released or prosecuted. And the orders would bring to an end a Central Intelligence Agency program that kept terrorism suspects in secret custody for months or years, a practice that has brought fierce criticism from foreign governments and human rights activists. They will also prohibit the CIA from using coercive interrogation methods, requiring the agency to follow the same rules used by the military in interrogating terrorism suspects, government officials said. But the orders would leave unresolved complex questions surrounding the closing of the Guantánamo prison, including whether, where and how any of the detainees are to be prosecuted. They could also allow Obama to reinstate the CIAs detention and interrogation operations in the future, by presidential order, as some have argued would be appropriate if Osama bin Laden or another top-level leader of Al Qaeda were captured. The new White House counsel, Gregory Craig, briefed lawmakers about some elements of the orders on Wednesday evening. A congressional official who attended the session said Craig acknowledged concerns from intelligence officials that new restrictions on CIA methods might be unwise and indicated that the White House might be open to allowing the use of methods other the 19 techniques allowed for the military. Details of the directive involving the CIA were described by government officials who insisted on anonymity so that they could not be blamed for pre-empting a White House announcement. Copies of the draft order on Guantánamo were provided by people who have consulted with Obama's transition team and requested anonymity for the same reason. The executive order on interrogations is certain to be received with some skepticism at the CIA, which for years has maintained that the military's interrogation rules are insufficient to get information from senior Qaeda figures like Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. The Bush administration asserted that the harsh interrogation methods were instrumental in gaining valuable intelligence on Qaeda operations. The intelligence agency built a network of secret prisons in 2002 to house and interrogate senior Qaeda figures captured overseas. The exact number of suspects to have moved through the prisons is unknown, although Michael Hayden, the departing director of the agency, has in the past put the number at "fewer than 100." The secret detentions brought international condemnation, and in September 2006, President George W. Bush ordered that the remaining 14 detainees in CIA custody be transferred to Guantánamo Bay and tried by military tribunals. But Bush made clear at the time that he was not shutting down the CIA detention system, and in the last two years, two Qaeda operatives are believed to have been detained in agency prisons for several months each before being transferred to Guantánamo Bay. A government official said Obama's order on the CIA would still allow its officers abroad to temporarily detain terrorism suspects and transfer them to other agencies, but would no longer allow the agency to carry out long-term detentions. Since the early days after the 2001 attacks, the intelligence agency's role in detaining terrorism suspects has been significantly scaled back, as has the severity of interrogation methods the agency is permitted to use. The most controversial practice, the simulated drowning technique known as water-boarding, was used on three suspects but has not been used since 2004, C.IA. officials said. But at the urging of the Bush administration, Congress in 2006 authorized the agency to continue using harsher interrogation methods than those permitted for use by other agencies, including the military. Those exact methods remain classified. The order on Guantánamo says that the camp, which received its first hooded and chained detainees seven years ago this month, "shall be closed as soon as practicable, and no later than one year from the date of this order." The order calls for a cabinet-level panel to grapple with issues including where in the United States prisoners might be moved and what courts they could be tried in. It also provides for a new diplomatic effort to transfer some of the remaining men, including more than 60 that the Bush administration had cleared for release. The order also directs an immediate assessment of the prison itself to ensure that the men are held in conditions that meet the humanitarian requirements of the Geneva Convention. That provision appeared to be a pointed embrace of the international treaties that the Bush administration often argued did not apply to detainees captured in the war against terrorism. The seven years of the detention camp have included four suicides, hunger strikes by scores of detainees, and accusations of extensive use of solitary confinement and abusive interrogations, which the Department of Defense has long denied. Last week a senior Pentagon official said she had concluded that interrogators at Guantánamo had tortured one detainee, who officials have said was a would-be "20th hijacker" in the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. The report of Thursday's expected announcement came after the new administration late Tuesday night ordered an immediate halt to the military commission proceedings for prosecuting detainees at Guantánamo and filed a request in Federal District Court in Washington to stay habeas corpus proceedings there. Government lawyers described both delays as necessary for the administration to make a broad assessment of detention policy. The cases immediately affected include those of five detainees charged as the coordinators of the 2001 attacks, including the case against Mohammed, the self-described mastermind. The decision to stop the commissions was described by the military prosecutors as a pause in the war-crimes system "to permit the newly inaugurated president and his administration time to review the military commission process generally and the cases currently pending before the military commissions, specifically." More than 200 detainees' habeas corpus cases have been filed in federal court, and lawyers said they expected that all of the cases would be stayed. Obama had suggested in the campaign that, in place of military commissions, he would prefer prosecutions in federal courts or, perhaps, in the existing military justice system, which provides legal guarantees similar to those of American civilian courts. Some human rights groups and lawyers for detainees said they were concerned about the one-year timetable. "It only took days to put these men in Guantánamo, it shouldn't take a year to get them out," said Vincent Warren, the executive director of the Center for Constitutional Rights in New York, which has coordinated detainees' lawyers. But several groups that had criticized the Bush administration's policies applauded the rapid moves by the new administration. Obama's actions "reaffirmed American values and are a ray of light after eight long, dark years," said Anthony Romero, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union.
Correction:
Notes: 12월 9일 Interesting story
Terrorists' Restless Leg Syndrome
by
Ann Coulter
11/26/2008
And now they're Obama's problem. If Obama wants his detention of Islamic terrorists to be dramatically different from Bush's Guantanamo, my suggestion is that he cut off -- so to speak -- the expensive prosthetic limb procedures now being granted the detained terrorists. Far from being sodomized and tortured by U.S. forces -- as Obama's base has wailed for the past seven years -- the innocent scholars and philanthropists being held at Guantanamo have been given expensive, high-tech medical procedures at taxpayer expense. If we're not careful, multitudes of Muslims will be going to fight Americans in Afghanistan just so they can go to Guantanamo and get proper treatment for attention deficit disorder and erectile dysfunction. After being captured fighting with Taliban forces against Americans in 2001, Abdullah Massoud was sent to Guantanamo, where the one-legged terrorist was fitted with a special prosthetic leg, at a cost of $50,000-$75,000 to the U.S. taxpayer. Under the Americans With Disabilities Act, Massoud would now be able to park his car bomb in a handicapped parking space! No, you didn't read that wrong, because the VA won't pay for your new glasses. I said $75,000. I would have gone with hanging at sunrise, but what do I know? Upon his release in March 2004, Massoud hippity-hopped back to Afghanistan and quickly resumed his war against the U.S. Aided by his new artificial leg, just months later, in October 2004, Massoud masterminded the kidnapping of two Chinese engineers in Pakistan working on the Gomal Zam Dam project. This proved, to me at least, that people with disabilities can do anything they put their minds to. Way to go, you plucky extremist! Massoud said he had nothing against the Chinese but wanted to embarrass Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf for cooperating with the Americans. You know, the Americans who had just footed -- you should pardon the expression -- a $75,000 bill for his prosthetic leg. Pakistani forces stormed Massoud's hideout, killing all the kidnappers, including Massoud. Only one of the Chinese engineers was rescued alive. As a result of the kidnapping, the Chinese pulled all 100 engineers and dam workers out of Pakistan, and work on the dam ceased. This was bad news for the people of Pakistan -- but good news for the endangered Pakistani snail darter! In none of the news accounts I read of Massoud's return to jihad after his release from Guantanamo is there any mention of the fact that his prosthetic leg was acquired in Guantanamo, courtesy of American taxpayers after he was captured trying to kill Americans on the battlefield in Afghanistan. News about the prosthetic leg might interfere with stories of the innocent aid workers being held captive at Guantanamo in George Bush's AmeriKKKa. To the contrary, although Massoud's swashbuckling reputation as a jihadist with a prosthetic leg appears in many news items, where he got that leg is almost purposely hidden -- even lied about. "Abdullah Massoud ... had earned both sympathy and reverence for his time in Guantanamo Bay. ... Upon his release, he made it home to Waziristan and resumed his war against the U.S. With his long hair, his prosthetic limb and impassioned speeches, he quickly became a charismatic inspiration to Waziristan's youth." -- The New York Times He's not a one-legged terrorist -- he's a freedom fighter living with a disability. I think we could all learn something about courage from this man. "He lost his leg in a landmine explosion a few days before the fall of Kabul to the Taliban in September 1996. It didn't dampen his enthusiasm as a fighter and he got himself an artificial leg later, says Yusufzai." -- The Indo-Asian News Service Where? At COSTCO? "The 29-year-old Massoud, who lost his left leg in a landmine explosion while fighting alongside the Taliban, often used to ride a horse or camel because his disability made it painful for him to walk long distances in hilly areas." -- BBC Monitoring South Asia Side-saddle, I'm guessing. And you just know those caves along the Afghan-Pakistan border aren't wheelchair accessible. "He was educated in Peshawar and was treated in Karachi after his left leg was blown up in a landmine explosion in the Wreshmin Tangi gorge near Kabul in September 1996. He now walks with an artificial leg specifically made for him in Karachi." -- Gulf News (United Arab Emirates) Karachi? Hey, how do I get into this guy's HMO? They can't lick leprosy in Karachi, but the Gulf News tells us Massoud got his artificial leg at one of their specialty hospitals. Anyone who thinks the Guantanamo detainees can be released without consequence doesn't have a leg to stand on. 12월 3일 More on Mushy
11월 11일 Danville, a new kind of American townWith international attention, is Danville’s economy bouncing back?BY SARAH ARKIN As Danville and Pittsylvania County make front-page stories in national media outlets, city and county officials point out a beneficial correlation between positive media coverage and economic growth. In just one month, the Richmond Times-Dispatch, The Washington Post and BusinessWeek ran features on the region’s collaboration and success in luring international companies and driving economic development. Now, the Washington bureau of Al Jazeera television is considering Danville for a documentary on so-called reverse globalization - international companies moving into the United States and inverting the trend of global outsourcing that effectively devastated Danville’s economy. “I definitely think that the announcements (of new international companies wanting to operate in Danville) and media coverage continue to feed one another,” said Laurie Moran, president of the Danville Pittsylvania County Chamber of Commerce. “The interest and inquiries that we have in this office continue to spike whenever there is media attention,” she said. “I think there’s a direct correlation.” In describing how “scrappy little Danville refused to give up on itself,” The Washington Post used the opening of Swedwood, the manufacturing subsidiary of Swedish furniture retailer IKEA, to focus on the role of international companies in the revitalization of this former mill town. Leading the story with Swedwood’s grand opening and quoting Swedwood officials singing Danville’s praises makes other companies interested in Southside, Danville Economic Development Director Jeremy Stratton said. “It snowballed ever since the Swedwood grand opening,” he said. “We’re getting a lot more attention in general. ...We’ll keep moving forward.” With an international viewership, a potential Al Jazeera story highlights the truly global aspect of the area’s revitalization, city officials said. “I think it’s indicative of what we’ve been able to achieve on a global level,” said retiring Danville City Manager Jerry Gwaltney, who has traveled all over the world in hopes of convincing companies to set up shot in Danville. “International recognition has helped,” he said. Sarah Arkin is a staff writer for the Danville Register & Bee in Danville, Va 11월 9일 I knowI know I just can't get enough of this Debbie Schlussel lady. But the next two post after the elections are too good to just not keep a copy of. I'm loving it. POST #1 Debbie Schlussel: America Elects the Vibe Magazine President . . . With Some Help From Little BeirutMy friend, Linda, says that America elected the "American Idol"
President, yesterday. But--as the trite saying goes--America elected
"The Vibe Magazine" President . . . with a little help from a mob of
Hezbollah members who now dominate Dearbornistan politics.
11월 8일 Won't go down quietlyThey just won't go down quietly. Had to find something to find something to deflect the attention away from the fact that they had just lost. -------------------------------------Debbie Schlussel: Sadness: John McCain Concedes, While Detroit FOX News Affiliate Cuts Away to Video of Obama Supporters' GyrationsBy Debbie Schlussel**** SCROLL DOWN FOR UPDATE **** John McCain just finished delivering his concession speech. It's the classiest, most gracious, most heart-felt concession speeches I've ever heard. The guy is a mensch. It was a great speech, well delivered, and sad to hear. If only it was a victory speech. Also, sad: Detroit's FOX News affiliate, which is owned and operated by FOX News' NewsCorp, cut away to scenes of urban Obama supporters doing victory dances and assorted "Soul Train"-style gyrations, while Senator McCain was delivering his concession speech. The audio was the McCain speech, but the video was the Obama hip-hoppers acting like they were in a Diddy video. Rude, obnoxious, and disgusting on the part of FOX 2 News. Credit that to FOX 2's classless News Director Dana Kennedy Hahn. **** UPDATE, 11/05/08: Reader Jim of Rouge Revival writes: Read your piece this a.m. ... and wanted to let you know that I was actually watching the Detroit Fox News Affiliate (Fox 2 Detroit) last night ... when they made the executive bone-head decision of the century, to show the "soul train gyration" celebration in Grant Park while John McCain was giving his concession speech. I was appalled as well and followed up this morning with both a phone call to the station, and a certified letter, documenting my disgust AND my choice to now get my local news from Channel 7 Detroit. Posted by Debbie on November 4, 2008 11:28 PM to Debbie Schlussel 10월 26일 Some scary stuffReading America’s mind-Dr Farrukh SaleemAmerica’s Pakistan-policy, or more appropriately Musharraf-policy, was fabricated by Vice President Dick Cheney, at the Old Executive Office Building, with input from the US Department of State at the Harry S Truman Building. Then came July 2008 and it all changed. In July, the Indian embassy in Kabul was bombed. In July, the United States Senate confirmed US Army General Petraeus as commander of US Central Command (CENTCOM). In July, the prime minister of Pakistan, under Rule 3(3) of the Rules of Business of 1973, placed the ISI under the administrative, financial and operation control of the Interior Division (and withdrew the order the following morning). In July, the New York Times, quoting CIA sources, alleged “links between members of the spy service, the Directorate of Inter-Services Intelligence, or the ISI, and the militant network led by Maulavi Jalaluddin Haqqani (a major reshuffle in the army had become inevitable after all this).” In July, the turf battle between the Department of State and the Department of Defence over Pakistan was won by Defence. Dick Cheney lost out to Robert Gates, the 22nd US secretary of defence, and (General) Michael Hayden, the 20th director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). From that point onwards, it was the CIA flying MQ-9 and RQ-9 predator unmanned aerial vehicles into Pakistani air space and General Petraeus had become the chief architect of America’s war strategy in this region. Pakistani decision makers have failed to read America’s changing policy dynamics. They went begging to Saudi Arabia for the Saudi Oil Facility when the facility had to be negotiated in Washington. We went begging to President Bush when Bush had become a lame duck and Pakistan policy was being run out of the Department of Defence. We went begging to China when China did not dare become an obstacle to American national interests in Pakistan. Clearly, America wants something from Pakistan that Pakistan is either not willing or incapable of delivering. In the meanwhile, the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) claims that its net reserves amount to $4.3 billion which — after accounting for gold and dollar repo agreements — may in effect be a mere billion dollars or so. In essence, the SBP may not have enough money to pay for the following month’s oil imports. Then there’s interest payment on Pakistan bond falling due for payment in December and a $500 million principal repayment due in another three months. While all this goes on in Pakistan, America has to take care of her own worst recession since the Great Depression. On October 14, parts of the new National Intelligence Estimates (NIEs) were leaked to McClatchy (32 daily newspapers and a total circulation of 3.3 million). Apparently, the NIE’s conclusion on the state of Pakistan is: “no money, no energy, no government.” Now, that is scary: “no government” in a nuclear-armed state. On the other side of the border, all that General Petraeus has is one combat brigade. Petraeus cannot do much but buy time till he has at least three additional combat brigades. On September 23, Robert Gates said that Pakistan was facing an “existential threat.” On October 31, Petraeus shall be taking over CENTCOM’s command and get an additional combat brigade by December and two more by the summer of 2009. Petraeus will then be in a position to negotiate and that too from a position of strength. November 4 is election day in America. In December, the SBP must pay interest due on its dollar bonds. On January 20, a new president of the United States will take office and whether it’s Obama or McCain South Asia’s war theatre is going to expand. In February, the SBP must pay back $500 million on a maturing dollar bond. The writer is an Islamabad-based freelance columnist farrukh15@hotmail.com Source: The News, 26/10/2008 10월 24일 Obama wants to reach out to PakistanisObama wants to reach out to PakistanisCHICAGO: Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama says he will reach out to the Pakistani people to build a lasting relationship, rather than look for temporary alliances with their government. In an exclusive interview with IANS, Obama acknowledged that the US and Pakistan must continue fighting terrorism together, but said working for the peopleís social and economic welfare is important. “While the US and Pakistan must continue to work together to combat terrorism that has claimed innocent lives in both countries and to destroy the terrorist sanctuaries along the Afghan-Pakistan border, I will make helping Pakistan tackle critical challenges like illiteracy, poverty, and lack of healthcare a key priority, by increasing aid in these areas,” Obama said. In what could be seen as a contrast to the Bush administrationís Pakistan policy that appeared to stress relations with the Musharrafís military regime, Obama said: “I will stand up for democratic institutions, civil society and judicial independence in Pakistan.” Underlining the orientation that an Obama administration will take if he is elected, he said: “I want to build a broad-based and lasting relationship with the people of Pakistan - not just temporary alliances with their government.” He added: “I co-sponsored legislation with Senator Lugar to triple non-military assistance to Pakistan and sustain it for the next decade.” “If we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets and President Musharraf does not act, we will,” Obama said. But now with Pervez Musharraf gone, he emphasised in this interview: “Working together with Pakistan to destroy the terrorist sanctuaries along the Afghan-Pakistan border.” http://www.opfblog.com/5248/obama-wants-to-reach-out-to-pakistanis/#more-5248 The News, 24/10/2008 10월 20일 Colin Powell Endorses Obama for PresidentQuite unbelievable that this is happening. Amazing! Video of the interview below
Quote YouTube - Colin Powell Endorses Obama for President Jews joke for Obama -- and they're serious
Jews joke for Obama -- and they're serious
http://www.arabtimesonline.com/client/pagesdetails.asp?nid=23707&ccid=18 NEW YORK, Oct 20, 2008 (AFP) - Heard about the black guy and the Jewish grandma? Or the strange contents of John McCain's fridge? Jewish Democrats fear Barack Obama is losing ground in the Jewish community to Republican McCain, especially in the key state of Florida, and they're fighting back -- with jokes. Shock comic Sarah Silverman is urging young Jews to make a 'Great Schlep' to their conservative grandparents in Florida and persuade them to vote Obama, the first African-American with a serious chance to become president. In a skit on www.greatschlep.com, seen by seven million Internet viewers, Silverman lists similarities between a young black man and a Jewish retiree: love of tracksuits, Cadillacs, jewelry. 'They both say 'yo' all the time, or Jews go right to left and say 'oy,'' Silverman quips. Oh, and 'all their friends are dying.' The jokey appeal, littered with swear words, has a serious message. Jews traditionally vote overwhelmingly Democratic, but Obama's share has slipped. Opinion polls show him with only about 60 percent of Jewish support nationwide, well below Democrat John Kerry's approximately 75 percent in the 2004 election that he lost to George W. Bush. That shift could make a difference in a tight contest -- particularly in the ultra-tight finish predicted in Florida, a state crucial to McCain's strategy and where about five percent of the vote is Jewish. 'If Barack Obama doesn't become the next president of the United States, I'm going to blame the Jews,' Silverman deadpans in her video. Analysts say conservative Jews -- who are just as likely to be young as old -- dislike Obama because of his race and his relatively doveish foreign policy platform. Perhaps the single most controversial issue for Obama among Jews is his desire to negotiate with Israel's enemy Iran, rather than continue Washington's current hard-line policies. He also suffers from an exotic name and the lingering effect of a whispering campaign by opponents that he secretly practices Islam. 'You know why your grandparents don't like Barack Obama?' Silverman asks. 'Because his name sounds scary, it sounds Moslem, which he's obviously not.' At an Obama fundraiser thrown this week by hip young New York Jews, comedians delivered a string of below-the-belt attacks on Republicans. Gabe Liedman and Jenny Slate conjured a crude scenario involving a hungry McCain and a bra in his fridge and they said his wife Cindy was a witch. 'If you say 'Cindy McCain' three times she appears out of the mirror and traps your soul in one of her many diamond necklaces,' Slate said. But when Seth Herzog took the stage, the defensiveness about Obama, albeit with humor, returned. 'If you know anything about Obama, one thing you know is he's not an Arab,' Herzog said in mock exasperation. 'He's a black guy, ladies and gentlemen!' The 'Great Schlep' has had more media success than impact on the ground. So far only about 100 Jews have travelled to Florida and another 100 to other states. However, several hundred more are expected to make the journey, said one of the organizers, Mik Moore of the Jewish Council for Education and Research. 'Even if this is not a huge number, you win elections through accumulative effort,' Moore said. Arlynn Greenbaum, 59, a literary agent in New York, said her 81-year-old mother, who lives in Florida, had been a typical hold-out. 'She doesn't trust Obama. I'd say she's prejudiced. We've had arguments, screaming arguments,' Greenbaum said.' 'Finally last weekend when we had our weekly phone call, she said, 'OK -- I'll vote Obama.'' Watch out, though, says Joshua Neuman, publisher of Heeb magazine. 'Jewish grandparents can be very sneaky. I don't trust them when they say 'I'll vote Obama.' That's the big X factor.' http://www.thegreatschlep.com/site/index.html |
|
|